红领巾瓜报

Insights

红领巾瓜报 Insights: Your source for healthcare news, ideas and analysis.

红领巾瓜报 Insights鈥攊ncluding briefs, webinars, and our podcast鈥攇ives you easy access to 红领巾瓜报鈥檚 deep expertise, helping you stay current on the latest healthcare trends and topics. Search for a topic of interest or browse the latest insights below.

or
or
Receive timely expert insights on topics you care about.

135 Results found.

Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Declines in Q2 2026: 红领巾瓜报 Analysis of State Trends and Market Share

Read Blog

红领巾瓜报 (红领巾瓜报) analyzed monthly Medicaid managed care鈥痚nrollment鈥痙ata reported by 34 states in the second quarter of 2026. Enrollment totaled 59.2 million members in June 2026鈥攁 decline of 3.5 million members (5.5%) from June 2025. The broader Medicaid and CHIP population has declined at approximately the same pace as managed care, with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) showing a 5.9% decrease from May 2025 to May 2026. 

The findings establish a timely baseline before new eligibility policies take effect. Under the 2025 budget reconciliation act (P.L. 119-21), now known as the Working Families Tax Cut (WFTC) Act, most states must implement Medicaid community engagement requirements for certain adults beginning January 1, 2027, conduct eligibility redeterminations every six months for this population, and implement other policies that will narrow Medicaid eligibility. 

Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Trends in Q2鈥2026 

红领巾瓜报 Information Services (红领巾瓜报IS) tracks monthly Medicaid enrollment for all states, including managed care enrollment in the subset of states with managed care programs. Among the 34 states with managed care programs that reported enrollment data in the second quarter of 2026: 

  • Enrollment changes varied across states, reflecting a combination of state-specific demographic, administrative, operational, and policy factors.聽
  • Only three states鈥擬ississippi, Nevada, and South Carolina鈥攔eported modest gains in Medicaid managed care enrollment since June 2025.聽
  • Arizona, Indiana, and Louisiana鈥痚ach reported double-digit declines, ranging from 10.1% to 21.1%.聽
  • The鈥痵even non-expansion states in this analysis鈥擣lorida, Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin鈥攅xperienced a鈥痙ecline of 455,000 (3.8%),鈥痓ringing鈥痚nrollment to鈥11.6鈥痬illion enrollees.聽

Among the鈥痚xpansion states in the analysis,鈥痚nrollment鈥痙ecreased鈥痓y鈥3鈥痬illion (5.9%) to鈥47.6鈥痬illion.鈥疶he larger decline among expansion states is particularly relevant because adults in expansion states will be most directly affected by the new community engagement and six-month redetermination policies. Details are illustrated in Figure 1. 

Figure 1. States Included in the Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Analysis, June 2026

Note: States colored as blue shown on the map above are included in the 红领巾瓜报 Enrollment Analysis. 

National Medicaid Managed Care Market Share 

红领巾瓜报IS also tracks Medicaid managed care ownership, program participation, and tax status for nearly 300 plans. In this June 2026 snapshot, Centene covered 17.9% of enrollees, followed by Elevance at 10.7%, UnitedHealth Group at 8%, and Molina at 6% (see Figure 2). These four organizations represented 42.6% of enrollment in the 红领巾瓜报IS dataset, underscoring continued concentration among large, national Medicaid managed care organizations. (Note: The number and mix of plans changed over the past 12 months, and several state enrollment reports reflect different reporting months. Other limitations are discussed in the Data Considerations section of this article.) 

The enrollment declines as well as pressure from acuity, utilization, and payment rates are compelling Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs) to reassess where they participate, including whether individual markets can support sustainable performance. For example, one national Medicaid MCO has publicly discussed exiting unprofitable Medicaid markets and left one state market in August 2026 with plans to exit another at the end of the year. These decisions illustrate how enrollment contraction can interact with rate adequacy, acuity, utilization, and state-specific contract performance to influence plan participation. 

Figure 2. National Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Share by Parent Organization, June 2026 

How Medicaid Work Requirements and Eligibility Policies Could Affect Enrollment in 2027 

In , approximately 20.4 million people were enrolled in Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion plans鈥5 million of whom reside in California, and nearly 2 million live in New York. The WFTC Act applies requirements to Affordable Care Act (ACA) expansion adults and certain Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration populations in 44 states beginning January 2027. 

In September 2026, CMS published an that outlines an optional framework that states may use to identify and verify individuals who qualify for the medical frailty exclusion. Although the framework gives states options for consideration, they still must determine which health conditions to cover and data sources to use when additional documentation is requested and how to notify members of their determinations. Many states have already made decisions about these issues, which could materially affect administrative workload, the consistency of determinations, and whether eligible individuals maintain coverage as well as the number of people who retain coverage and the composition of the population that remains enrolled. 

In addition, a few states have already started implementing the new eligibility policies. For example, Nebraska launched Medicaid work/community engagement requirements on May 1,鈥2026. Montana began implementation on July 1, 2026, while Arkansas began a soft launch in July 2026 before enforcement begins in January 2027. Iowa intends to begin early implementation December 1, 2026. Although Montana and Arkansas are not managed care states, they, along with Nebraska, can offer directional insights on beneficiary response, exclusion determinations, procedural losses, appeals, and administrative workload before nationwide implementation. 

Notably, the second quarter鈥痚nrollment decline predates full implementation of the new federal eligibility policy changes and community engagement requirement, which means future enrollment changes may not be entirely attributable to the WFTCA requirements. 

Organizations should continue to monitor total enrollment, churn, eligibility category, risk mix, and transitions to Marketplace or uninsured status. 

Data Considerations. 红领巾瓜报 Information Services (红领巾瓜报IS) tracks monthly Medicaid managed care enrollment, ownership, program participation, and tax status for approximately 300 plans. The data in this analysis have some important limitations. States report enrollment figures at different points throughout the month, with鈥痵ome data鈥痳eflecting鈥痓eginning of the month totals鈥痑苍诲鈥痮thers capturing鈥痚nd of month鈥痚nrollment.鈥疘n addition,鈥痵ome鈥痵tate datasets encompass all Medicaid programs that offer managed care plans, whereas others reflect only a subset of the managed Medicaid population. As a result, the analysis can be used to identify direction, magnitude, and market signals rather than as a comprehensive state-by-state comparison. 

The 红领巾瓜报IS enrollment reports and analyses, available through subscription, use鈥痙ata from鈥痭early 300鈥痟ealth plans in 39 states, DC, and Puerto Rico. 红领巾瓜报IS鈥檚鈥疢edicaid鈥痚nrollment data, financials,鈥痯rocurement鈥痶racking, and a robust library of public documents鈥痚quips stakeholders with鈥痶imely, actionable intelligence. Subscribe here

Preparing for Enrollment Shifts

WFTC Act implementation will require state-specific policy decisions, eligibility system changes, new data-matching processes, staff training, beneficiary outreach, and workable approaches to identifying people who qualify for exemptions for medical frailty and other conditions. Differences in data availability, verification pathways, documentation requirements, and review processes could produce materially different effects on enrollment, continuity of coverage, beneficiary experience, and the risk profile of the population that remains enrolled. 

Healthcare executives and state Medicaid leaders should establish a baseline, monitor emerging implementation signals, and model the operational and financial implications. Priority measures include enrollment and churn, procedural terminations, exclusion determinations, appeals, transitions to other coverage, changes in acuity and utilization, payer mix, and geographic variation. These insights can inform decisions about eligibility operations, beneficiary support, capitation and rate development, network strategy, provider reimbursement, revenue forecasting, and uncompensated care exposure. 

MCOs are unable to help states with determining eligibility determination or compliance, cannot receive capitation rate bumps for non-medical activities, or use their own work programs to help beneficiaries meet the community engagement requirements but may be able to provide support through outreach and education. CMS has indicated it expects to provide additional guidance on what activities are appropriate. MCOs can potentially use their existing relationships with beneficiaries, care managers, providers, and community organizations to help members understand and navigate the new requirements. 

红领巾瓜报IS provides the market intelligence needed to track these shifts, including state-reported enrollment, plan ownership, financial performance, procurement activity, and related public documents. 红领巾瓜报 consultants extend that intelligence through state- and market-specific scenario modeling, policy and operational analysis, and implementation support鈥攈elping clients forecast enrollment and revenue, assess payer mix and utilization effects, strengthen eligibility and beneficiary support workflows, evaluate competitive positioning, and prepare for changes in program financing and oversight. 

Contact 红领巾瓜报 to translate evolving enrollment and implementation signals into an actionable strategy for your state, market, or organization.

CMS Proposed Rule (CMS-2452-P) Could Reshape State Health Insurer Assessments鈥攁nd Put Marketplace and Reinsurance Funding at Risk

Download

What CMS-2452-P Means for State-Based Marketplaces, Section 1332 Reinsurance Programs, the individual market, and Medicaid Financing

On July 14, 2026, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Amending the Indirect Hold Harmless Threshold of Health Care-Related Taxes Proposed Rule (CMS-2452-P) to implement Section 71115 of the 2025 budget reconciliation legislation, P.L. 119-21, now known as the Working Families Tax Cut.

Although the proposal is primarily intended to reform Medicaid financing and provider taxes, it raises broader questions about whether state assessments on commercial health insurers鈥攊ncluding those used to fund State-Based Marketplaces (SBMs), Section 1332 reinsurance programs, and other state affordability initiatives鈥攃ould become subject to new federal limitations.

红领巾瓜报鈥檚 latest analysis examines the proposed rule, explains the policy changes, and explores the potential implications for states, insurers, Marketplace authorities, and policymakers.

Download the full white paper to understand what CMS is proposing, what remains unclear, and what organizations should be monitoring as the rulemaking process continues.

DOWNLOAD

Executive Summary

CMS Proposed Rule CMS-2452-P would establish a new permissible provider tax class for the 鈥渟ervices of health insurers.鈥 Although the proposal is framed as implementing Medicaid financing reforms under Section 71115 of the 2025 budget reconciliation legislation, now known as the Working Families Tax Cut, it introduces uncertainty about whether insurer assessments used to finance commercial market programs鈥攊ncluding State-Based Marketplaces and Section 1332 reinsurance programs鈥攃ould also become subject to Medicaid provider tax requirements.

The proposed rule is unclear as to whether these new limitations apply only to taxes associated with Medicaid financing or extend more broadly to commercial insurance assessments. That distinction could have significant implications for states that rely on insurer assessments to support Marketplace operations, affordability programs, and other insurance initiatives.


Key Takeaways

  • CMS proposes creating a new permissible provider tax class for services of health insurers.
  • The proposal implements Section 71115 of the Working Families Tax Cut Act, which changes the indirect hold harmless thresholds for healthcare-related taxes.
  • The rule is primarily focused on Medicaid financing, but its language raises questions about commercial insurer assessments.
  • State-Based Marketplaces (SBMs) and Section 1332 reinsurance programs may face uncertainty if existing insurer assessments become subject to the new framework.
  • CMS has not clearly explained whether the proposal applies only to Medicaid financing or to all state insurer assessments.
  • States, insurers, and Marketplace leaders are expected to seek additional clarification during the public comment process.

What You鈥檒l Learn from This White Paper

This paper explains:

  • What CMS Proposed Rule CMS-2452-P would change
  • How Section 71115 of the Working Families Tax Cut Act modifies provider tax rules
  • Why states are closely evaluating the proposal
  • Potential implications for State-Based Marketplaces
  • Possible effects on Section 1332 waiver reinsurance programs
  • How the proposal compares with CMS鈥檚 2019 Medicaid Fiscal Accountability Regulation (MFAR)
  • Key policy questions CMS has yet to answer
  • What states, insurers, and Marketplace organizations should monitor moving forward

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CMS-2452-P?

CMS Proposed Rule (CMS-2452-P) would implement Section 71115 of the Working Families Tax Cut Act (WFTCA) by modifying the federal indirect hold harmless framework for healthcare-related taxes and creating a new permissible tax class for services of health insurers.

What does Section 71115 of the WFTCA do?

Section 71115 replaces the historical nationwide indirect hold harmless threshold with new state-specific and provider class-specific limits for healthcare-related taxes used in Medicaid financing.

Could this proposal affect State-Based Marketplaces?

Potentially. Many State-Based Marketplaces are funded through assessments on commercial health insurers. The proposed rule does not clearly explain whether these assessments would become subject to the new provider tax framework.

Could Section 1332 reinsurance programs be affected?

Possibly. Many Section 1332 reinsurance programs rely on insurer assessments to support state funding. If CMS interprets the proposal broadly, future changes to these assessments could face new federal limitations.

Does the proposed rule apply only to Medicaid financing?

This remains one of the most important unanswered questions. The proposal is issued under Medicaid financing authority but introduces a new insurer tax class without clearly defining whether it applies exclusively to Medicaid-related taxes or more broadly to commercial insurance assessments.

Why should insurers and states pay attention?

If finalized as broadly interpreted, the proposal could affect future funding flexibility for State-Based Marketplaces, Section 1332 waiver programs, and other state affordability initiatives financed through insurer assessments.


Why It Matters

State governments increasingly rely on commercial insurer assessments to finance programs that improve health coverage affordability and stabilize insurance markets.

These funding mechanisms support:

  • State-Based Marketplace operations
  • Section 1332 reinsurance programs
  • Individual market affordability initiatives
  • Other state programs

If CMS ultimately determines that these assessments fall within the new health insurer tax class established in Section 71115, states may face new constraints on increasing existing assessments or creating new funding mechanisms after July 4, 2025.

Because the proposed rule does not clearly answer this question, states and insurers face considerable policy uncertainty while CMS completes the rulemaking process.


How This Proposal Differs from the 2019 MFAR Rule

CMS previously proposed creating a health insurer tax class in the 2019 Medicaid Fiscal Accountability Regulation (MFAR).

However, today鈥檚 proposal differs in one important way. Since Congress enacted Section 71115 of the Working Families Tax Cut Act, the proposed insurer tax class would now operate within a new statutory framework that includes state-specific indirect hold harmless thresholds. As a result, the potential policy implications extend beyond those in the 2019 proposal.


Why 红领巾瓜报鈥檚 Analysis Matters

红领巾瓜报鈥檚 policy experts, actuaries, Medicaid financing specialists, and Marketplace consultants work with states, health plans, and public agencies across the country to evaluate federal policy changes and their operational and financial impacts.

The proposed rule leaves several important policy questions unresolved. Understanding its potential implications now can help states, insurers, Marketplace leaders, and policymakers prepare for future regulatory changes.

Download 红领巾瓜报鈥檚 full analysis to explore the proposal in greater detail, understand its potential impacts, and identify key questions that may shape the final rule.


Need Assistance?

红领巾瓜报鈥檚 experts advise states, health plans, Marketplace authorities, and other healthcare stakeholders on Medicaid financing, Section 1332 waivers, Marketplace operations, actuarial strategy, and federal regulatory implementation. If you have questions about how CMS Proposed Rule CMS-2452-P could affect your organization, contact one of the report authors to discuss your specific circumstances.

CY 2027 OPPS Proposed Rule Signals Major Changes for 340B Hospitals, Site-Neutral Payments, and Digital Health

Read Blog

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the  proposed rule (CMS-1850-P), July 2, outlining policies that would take effect, if finalized, January 1, 2027. Although the proposed rule includes annual payment updates, it also offers insights into the agency鈥檚 broader policy agenda. 

CMS continues to advance several long-term priorities, including site-neutral payment reform, elimination of the inpatient only list to migrate services to lower-cost settings, and efforts to align reimbursement more closely with acquisition costs for pharmaceuticals purchased through the 340B Drug Pricing Program. CMS is refining its policies that encountered operational or legal challenges, most notably in the case of its 340B payment proposals. 

The rule also signals how CMS is preparing Medicare for the next generation of healthcare delivery. As software-based therapies, artificial intelligence, and other health technology become increasingly integrated into care delivery, the agency is laying the groundwork for payment policies that reflect evolving care models and emerging medical innovation.   

This article highlights five proposals that may have significant financial, operational, and strategic implications across the healthcare system.  

Highlights of Key Changes in the OPPS Proposed Rule 

1. CMS Intends to Cut to Reimbursement for Drugs Acquired Under the 340B Program 

Based on findings from a survey of hospital acquisition costs, CMS proposes reducing reimbursement for drugs acquired through the 340B Drug Pricing Program from Average Sales Price (ASP) plus 6 percent to ASP minus 33.4 percent beginning in CY 2027. CMS estimates the policy could reduce Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) drug spending by $4.55 billion in its first year, which would be redistributed to non-drug service payments under OPPS鈥檚 budget neutrality rules. 

The proposal would similarly reduce payment rates for 340B drugs paid under alternative methodologies, including those reimbursed using Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC). Vaccines, pass-through drugs, and certain non-opioid pain management products would remain exempt, as would Children鈥檚 Hospitals, Sole Community Hospitals, and PPS-exempt cancer hospitals. 

CMS also proposes applying the policy to 340B drugs administered in non-excepted off-campus provider-based departments while leaving reimbursement for non-340B drugs unchanged. 

红领巾瓜报 (红领巾瓜报) Analysis: CMS is effectively continuing a policy discussion that has been ongoing for nearly a decade. Although prior litigation altered the agency鈥檚 approach, the proposal demonstrates CMS鈥檚 continued interest in aligning Medicare reimbursement more closely with acquisition costs for 340B drugs. The financial implications will vary significantly across hospitals depending on their reliance on 340B savings. At the same time, providers with limited 340B exposure may benefit from the budget-neutral redistribution of savings elsewhere in the OPPS payment system. 

2. Because of the 340B Payment Cuts, Hospitals Will See an Increase in the Conversion Factor Used to Set Payments for Most Non-Drug Items and Services  

CMS proposes an overall 2.4 percent payment increase in OPPS payments for CY 2027, but payment levels will vary under the rule based on major policy changes. The proposed 340B payment reduction, for instance, would trigger an 8.44 percent increase in the conversion factor for non-drug services. CMS is also proposing a conversion factor reduction of 3 percent intended to recover increased payments hospitals received for non-drug items and services as a result of CMS鈥檚 remedy related to prior 340B reimbursement cuts.i 

红领巾瓜报 Analysis: The proposed payment updates illustrate how interconnected Medicare payment policies have become. Organizations should look beyond the headline increase and evaluate how individual provisions interact. The proposed reduction in 340B reimbursement serves as a budget-neutral offset that increases the OPPS conversion factor, creating winners and losers across provider categories. Separately, the proposal would accelerate the pace and magnitude of legal-remedy-related rate reductions originating from the termination of an earlier iteration of the 340B payment reduction policy. Understanding this redistribution effect will be critical for forecasting organization-specific financial effects. 

3. More Proceduresare Moving to the Outpatient Setting 

CMS proposes removing 638 procedures from the Medicare Inpatient Only (IPO) list in CY 2027, representing nearly half of the remaining procedures designated as such. The proposed removals focus on less complex services across several clinical areas, including digestive, endocrine, respiratory, urinary, maternity, and other procedural categories. 

红领巾瓜报 Analysis: This proposal continues CMS鈥檚 long-term strategy of shifting appropriate services to outpatient settings. As the IPO list continues to shrink, hospitals will have greater flexibility to conduct procedures in the outpatient setting than in the past. At the same time, hospitals billing for certain previously IPO-listed services in inpatient settings could encounter greater scrutiny and pressure to migrate towards outpatient sites. Because many commercial coverage policies and utilization management approaches have historically relied on Medicare鈥檚 IPO framework, the proposal may accelerate broader market movement toward outpatient care, creating operational, capacity, and revenue implications for providers. 

4. Site-Neutral Payment Reform Remains a Long-Term CMS Priority

CMS proposes extending site-neutral payment policies to imaging services without contrast provided in excepted off-campus provider-based departments (PBDs). The agency notes substantial growth in the utilization and spending associated with these services over the past decade and views the proposal as a continuation of broader efforts to reduce payment differentials across sites of care. This proposal follows CMS鈥檚 recent expansion of site-neutral payment policies for drug administration services. 

红领巾瓜报 Analysis: The proposal reinforces that site-neutral payment reform remains a priority for CMS. Although the immediate policy targets imaging services without contrast, stakeholders should view the proposal within the context of a broader and continuing effort to reduce payment differentials between hospital outpatient departments and physician office settings. Hospitals with significant outpatient imaging capacity鈥攑articularly in off-campus PBDs鈥攕hould evaluate the potential financial impact and consider how future site-neutral policies could affect other service lines. Hospitals should also anticipate incremental additions to this framework in the future, as CMS continues to scrutinize site-of-care allocations for services.  

5. A Future Framework for AI and Digital Health is in the Works, While Maintaining Existing Policies in the Short Term  

Recognizing the growing role of software and AI-enabled technologies in healthcare delivery, CMS proposes using CY 2027 as a bridge year while it develops a longer-term payment approach for technologies categorized as Software as a Medical Service (SaMS). Under the proposal, technologies currently assigned to New Technology Ambulatory Payment Classifications (NT-APCs) would generally maintain their payment assignments during CY 2027. 

红领巾瓜报 Analysis: Although the proposal preserves near-term payment stability, it may be one of the most consequential signals in the rule for manufacturers, digital health companies, investors, and providers adopting new technologies. CMS is exploring how software-based interventions, AI-enabled tools, and algorithm-driven services generate value and how that value should be reflected in Medicare payment policy. Future reimbursement methodologies will likely place greater emphasis on demonstrated clinical outcomes, efficiency gains, and measurable impacts on healthcare utilization. Organizations developing or deploying these technologies should view CY 2027 as an opportunity to prepare for a more mature reimbursement framework in the years ahead and to engage with CMS on preferred policy approaches. 

Looking Ahead 

The CY 2027 OPPS proposed rule provides insight into the direction of Medicare reimbursement policy, changes in Hospital Conditions of Participation (CoP) for obstetrical services, and planned revisions to the exceptions to the 鈥渇our walls鈥 requirement under the Medicaid clinic benefit for Indian Health Services/Tribal clinics, behavioral health clinics, and clinics located in rural areas. For hospitals, health systems, manufacturers, life sciences companies, digital health organizations, and investors, now is the time to assess potential impacts and evaluate strategic responses before policies are finalized. Comments on the proposed rule are due August 31, 2026. 

红领巾瓜报 is helping organizations understand the financial, operational, and market implications of the proposed rule through: 

  • Customized聽financial impact聽modeling聽
  • 340B reimbursement and redistribution analyses聽
  • Site-neutral payment impact聽analyses聽
  • Clinical service line and specialty-specific analyses聽
  • Medicare聽and Medicaid聽policy scenario planning and forecasting聽
  • Regulatory comment strategy development聽

As CMS continues to pull the thread on several long-term policy priorities, organizations that begin planning now will be better positioned to navigate the changes ahead. Contact 红领巾瓜报鈥檚 Medicare experts to discuss how these proposals may affect your organization and explore potential strategic responses before the final rule is released.

Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Declines in Q1 2026: 红领巾瓜报 Analysis of State Trends and Market Share

Read Blog

红领巾瓜报 (红领巾瓜报) analyzed monthly Medicaid managed care enrollment data from 34 states to assess enrollment trends as of March 2026. The findings show that Medicaid managed care enrollment continued to decline as states navigate new eligibility policies and preparations for new Medicaid community engagement requirements under the 2025 budget reconciliation act, P.L. 119-21, now known as the Working Families Tax Cut (WFTC) Act. These trends serve as an early indicator of how policy and programmatic changes may affect Medicaid enrollment levels in the years ahead.

Drawing on monthly enrollment data from the 34 states, 红领巾瓜报 found that Medicaid managed care enrollment fell to 60.4 million members in March 2026鈥攁 decline of 3.1 million members from March 2025, or 4.8 percent year over year. As states prepare to address this issue, this enrollment snapshot provides important insights into how administrative and policy changes may shape Medicaid participation in the years ahead.

Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Trends in Q1 2026

红领巾瓜报 Information Services (红领巾瓜报IS) maintains a database of monthly Medicaid enrollment from all 50 states and Puerto Rico. The most recent 红领巾瓜报 analysis showed that enrollment declines were widespread across the 34 states studied (Figure 1). Key findings include:

  • Enrollment changes varied considerably across states, reflecting a combination of state-specific demographic, administrative, operational, and policy factors.
  • Of the 34 states,聽only four鈥擟olorado, Mississippi, Nevada, and South Carolina鈥攕howed modest gains in Medicaid managed care enrollment from March 2025.
  • Several states experienced particularly significant declines. Arizona, Indiana, Kansas, and Louisiana聽each reported data reflecting , ranging from
  • Among the聽expansion states in the analysis,聽enrollment聽declined聽by聽2.5聽million (5 percent) to聽48.4聽million.聽The聽eight non-expansion states聽included in this analysis experienced聽a聽decline of 547,000 (4.4 percent),聽bringing聽enrollment to聽12聽million enrollees.

Figure 1. 红领巾瓜报 Analysis of Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment in 34 States, March 2026

Note: States colored as blue shown on the map above are included in the 红领巾瓜报 Enrollment Analysis.

National Medicaid Managed Care Market Share

红领巾瓜报IS鈥檚 resource contains information on approximately 300 Medicaid managed care plans across 41 states and tracks corporate ownership, program participation, and tax status among participating plans.

As of March 2026, Centene held the largest share of the national Medicaid managed care market at 17.9 percent. Elevance followed with 10.6 percent, while United and Molina accounted for 8.4 percent and 6.0 percent, respectively (see Figure 2). These four organizations represented 42.9 percent of enrollment among the plans analyzed, underscoring continued concentration among large, national Medicaid managed care organizations, even as overall enrollment declines.

Figure 2. National Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Share by Parent Organization, March 2026

How Medicaid Work Requirements and Eligibility Policies Could Affect Enrollment in 2027

The enrollment trends observed at the end of the first quarter (Q1) of 2026 come on the cusp of significant policy change. On June 1, 2026, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released an interim final rule establishing a national framework for implementing Medicaid community engagement requirements under P.L. 119-21. The rule outlines federal parameters for eligibility exemptions and state implementation responsibilities.

States must now translate these federal requirements into operational eligibility policies, technology systems, administrative procedures, and beneficiary communications. As implementation moves forward, enrollment trends will provide important insights into how policy changes and state implementation affect enrollment levels and continuity of coverage across Medicaid programs.

Several states are advancing implementation of the new eligibility policies. Nebraska launched Medicaid work/community engagement requirements on May 1, 2026. Montana plans to begin implementation on July 1, 2026, while Arkansas intends to begin a soft launch of the new requirements in July 2026 before enforcement begins in January 2027.

Declines in enrollment are often an early indicator of broader impacts across the healthcare system, including uncompensated care levels, shifts in payer mix, and increased financial pressure on safety鈥憂et systems. For managed care organizations, even modest enrollment changes can mask shifts in risk profiles, geographic concentration, or service needs.

Data Considerations.The data in this analysis have some important limitations. States report enrollment figures at different points throughout the month, with some data reflecting beginning of the month totals and others capturing end of month enrollment. In addition, some state datasets encompass all Medicaid programs offering managed care plans, whereas others reflect only a subset of the managed Medicaid population. As a result, the findings should be viewed as indicative of broader trends rather than a comprehensive state-by-state comparison.

The 红领巾瓜报IS enrollment reports and analyses, available through subscription, use data from nearly 300 health plans in 41 states.鈥疶he report provides by-plan enrollment plus corporate ownership, program inclusion, and for-profit versus not-for-profit status, with breakout tabs for publicly traded plans. 红领巾瓜报IS鈥檚 Medicaid enrollment data, financials, procurement tracking, and a robust library of public documents鈥痚quips stakeholders with timely, actionable intelligence. Subscribe here.

Connect with Us

红领巾瓜报 knows the Medicaid managed care landscape and how it is evolving. Medicaid changes under the WFTCA are affecting eligibility, financing, waivers, managed care oversight, provider reimbursement, and program integrity. 红领巾瓜报 helps organizations assess impact, plan next steps, and move from policy analysis to implementation with confidence. Contact us to prepare your organization.

Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment: Q4 2025 Trends and Early Signals Ahead of New Eligibility Policies

Read Blog

This week 红领巾瓜报 (红领巾瓜报), draws on its database of monthly Medicaid managed care enrollment to present its latest quarterly analysis, offering a snapshot of enrollment trends across 37 states. 

The analysis comes at a critical time. As states prepare for Medicaid eligibility policy changes that take effect in 2027鈥攊ncluding more frequent eligibility determinations and expanded work and community engagement requirements鈥攃urrent enrollment trends provide an early signal of how policy decisions and administrative practices are already influencing coverage levels. 

The 红领巾瓜报 Information Services (红领巾瓜报IS) analysis shows that Medicaid managed care accounted for 85.6 percent of total Medicaid enrollment in December 2025. This analysis, available to 红领巾瓜报IS subscribers, uses data from nearly 300 health plans in 41 states.鈥疶he report provides by-plan enrollment plus corporate ownership, program inclusion, and for-profit versus not-for-profit status, with breakout tabs for publicly traded plans. 

Key Insights from Q4 2025 Data 

The 37 states included in this review have released monthly Medicaid managed care enrollment data through public websites or in response to a public records request from 红领巾瓜报. The report includes the most recent data obtained and illustrates the effect of state-level choices around eligibility and administration. Key findings include: 

  • As of聽December聽2025,聽Medicaid managed care enrollment across the 37 states declined by聽2.2 million members聽year over year, falling to 62.5 million鈥攁聽3.4 percent decrease.聽
  • Of the 37 states,聽eight鈥擟olorado, Delaware, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, and Oregon鈥攄id聽not聽experience year-over-year聽managed care enrollment聽declines,聽and聽instead showed聽flat enrollment or modest gains.聽With the exception of Mississippi, these聽are聽all聽Medicaid expansion states.聽
  • Arizona聽and Indiana聽experienced聽double-digit聽percentage聽declines. Notably,聽Indiana began requiring聽enrollees聽to actively respond to renewal mailers,聽which aligns with聽enrollment declines that began in March 2025.聽
  • Among the聽expansion states in the analysis,聽enrollment聽declined聽by聽1.7聽million (-3.3%) to聽50.8聽million.聽The聽seven non-expansion states聽experienced聽a聽similar聽decline (-3.6%),聽bringing聽enrollment to聽11.7聽million enrollees.聽

Data Considerations. The data have some important limitations. States report enrollment figures at different points during the month, with some data reflecting beginning of the month totals and others capturing end of the month enrollment. In addition, some state datasets encompass all Medicaid programs offering managed care plans, whereas others reflect only a subset of the managed Medicaid population. As a result, the findings should be viewed as indicative of broader trends rather than a comprehensive state-by-state comparison.鈥&苍产蝉辫;

Market Share and Plan Dynamics 

Using our data repository for 300 health plans across 41 states, 红领巾瓜报IS analyzes corporate ownership, program participation, and tax status among Medicaid managed care plans. As of December 2025, Centene maintained the largest share of the national Medicaid managed care market at 17.8 percent, followed by Elevance (10.4%), United (8.5%), and Molina (6.0%) (see Figure 1).鈥疶hese figures highlight continued concentration among large national plans, even as overall enrollment declines. 

Figure 1. National Medicaid Managed Care Market Share by Number of Beneficiaries for a Sample of Publicly Traded Plans, December 2025 

What to Watch鈥 

Enrollment trends observed in the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2025 and continuing into 2026 indicate increasing state attention to eligibility policy and program integrity. State legislative activity, budget pressures, and federal regulatory developments are prompting many states to assess and strengthen certain aspects of their programs related to eligibility, particularly as they prepare to implement redetermination and work and community engagement requirements. 

Several states are already moving toward implementation. Nebraska is scheduled to launch Medicaid work requirements on May 1,聽2026,聽while Montana plans to begin implementation on July 1, 2026. With聽additional聽federal guidance still聽emerging, most other states are working toward compliance ahead of January 2027 deadlines.聽In聽expansion聽states,聽policymakers聽retain聽authority to tighten administrative processes, alter optional benefits, or adjust provider payment levels鈥攁ctions that聽may聽materially affect enrollment.聽

These developments underscore why Medicaid managed care enrollment trends deserve close attention. Declines in enrollment are often an early indicator of broader system impacts, including rising uncompensated care for providers, shifts in payer mix, and increased financial pressure on safety鈥憂et systems. For managed care organizations, even modest enrollment changes can mask more significant shifts in risk profiles, geographic concentration, or service needs. 

Connect with Us鈥 

红领巾瓜报 is home to experts who know the Medicaid managed care landscape聽and how it is evolving. 红领巾瓜报IS鈥檚聽Medicaid聽enrollment data, financials,聽procurement聽tracking, and a robust library of public documents鈥痚quips stakeholders with聽timely, actionable intelligence.聽

For more information about the 红领巾瓜报IS subscription, contact鈥Andrea Maresca鈥痑苍诲鈥Alona Nenko.鈥&苍产蝉辫;

Strategies to Address Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Non-Emergency Medical Transportation

Read Blog

Fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA) in Medicaid non-emergency transportation (NEMT) remain a persistent challenge for state Medicaid programs and health plans because of the scale and complexity of the benefit. NEMT is a critical, mandatory benefit intended to ensure eligible Medicaid beneficiaries without reliable transportation can get to necessary medical appointments. Numerous investigations and audits, however, have revealed that some transportation providers bill for trips that never occurred, inflate mileage, fabricate tolls, or even recruit patients with kickbacks to generate fraudulent claims, diverting limited program funding away from legitimate care needs.

The NEMT benefit represents a small share of Medicaid costs鈥攅stimated at around 1 percent of total Medicaid spending. With the codification of NEMT as a required benefit in 2020, market analysts forecast NEMT will grow considerably, nearly doubling in market size from 2021 to 2028.

Comprehensive, nationwide estimates specific to NEMT FWA are limited. Federal and state audits like those in , , and , however, have uncovered millions of dollars in claims that did not comply with federal and state requirements, underscoring systemic vulnerabilities in oversight and documentation. For example, a 2022 federal audit of New York Medicaid NEMT found an estimated $84 million in unallowable federal reimbursements and another ~$112 million that may not have complied with requirements over two years.[1]

Furthermore, individual criminal cases have involved schemes of $1 million to more than $2 million in falsely billed transportation services. Isolated settlements and audits indicate that fraud and abuse can be substantial locally even if we lack a clear, reliable national aggregate estimate.

A 2025 report by 红领巾瓜报 (红领巾瓜报) about NEMT contracting approaches found an opportunity for states and health plans that administer non-emergency transportation to leverage technology and require or incentivize new strategies to improve program integrity and quality in NEMT going forward. Some of the identified strategies to address FWA include:

  • Adopting or requiring digital solutions鈥攕uch as GPS trip verification, electronic visit logs, and real-time data analytics鈥攖o detect irregular billing patterns before claims are paid, replacing outdated paper logs and manual reconciliations that were prone to error and exploitation.
  • Focusing trip verification efforts on standing orders (pre-approved authorizations often for repeated treatments), given that they comprise the largest share of trips and are often vulnerable to fraud.
  • Positioning and educating medical facilities to be critical partners in preventing FWA by confirming appointment attendance, either via phone or signature on the trip log.
  • Automating mileage reimbursement (for enrollees who drive themselves or are driven by family members or friends) through a mobile app, which enabling riders to schedule and track their trips and submit claims quickly while allowing NEMT brokers to verify the mileage using GPS. This system would also allow brokers to better target their anti-fraud efforts, such as requiring additional documentation only for higher reimbursement amounts.

Since the publication of that report, several state Medicaid programs have issued NEMT procurements that maintain a strong emphasis on preventing FWA. For example, the 2025 Wisconsin NEMT RFP included provisions to promote greater collaboration between the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) and NEMT broker, including 鈥渜uarterly and ad hoc meetings to discuss open complaint investigations, red flag patterns, and establish safeguards for ongoing or suspected fraud, waste, and abuse鈥 and imposed penalties for fraud incidents that go undetected by the broker.

FWA in Medicaid NEMT may represent a fraction of overall program spending, but the consequences are outsized: Every improper payment diverts resources away from beneficiaries who depend on transportation to access essential care. As states, health plans, and NEMT brokers modernize contract requirements, strengthen oversight, and embed technology-driven verification into their contracts and operations, the focus is shifting from retrospective recovery to proactive prevention, transparency, and accountability in transportation services.

Continued collaboration among Medicaid agencies, brokers, medical providers, and oversight entities will be critical for sustained progress. By pairing smarter contracting with real-time data tools and clear accountability, states and Medicaid health plans can better safeguard public dollars while ensuring that NEMT remains a reliable lifeline for the people it is designed to serve.

Learn more about how 红领巾瓜报 Helps NEMT Stakeholders Overcome Challenges. If your organization is ready to talk about how 红领巾瓜报 can help advance your NEMT goals, please contact one of our experts below.

Related Resources:


[1] US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General. New York Claimed $196 Million, Over 72 Percent of the Audited Amount, in Federal Reimbursement for NEMT Payments to New York City Transportation Providers That Did Not Meet or May Not Have Met Medicaid Requirements. September 12, 2022. Available at: .

CBO鈥檚 New Baseline Signals Shifting Cost and Risk Dynamics in Medicaid and Medicare

Read Blog

On February 11, 2026, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released  report. The publication, which represents the first time CBO has released Medicare and Medicaid spending baseline projections since , reflects the impact of the 2025 Budget Reconciliation Act (P.L. 119-21, OBBBA), recent changes to Medicare reimbursement for skin substitute products, and the latest Medicare Part D and Medicare Advantage bids.

CBO鈥檚 baseline serves many functions, including serving as the official 鈥渟corekeeping鈥 benchmark used for cost estimates of proposed legislation under consideration in Congress.

Changes to CBO鈥檚 Medicaid Baseline

CBO decreased its projections of 2026鈥2035  by approximately $514 million from its January 2025 baseline update. The main driver of that reduction is the impact of the Medicaid provisions in the 2025 Budget Reconciliation Act, which CBO expects will reduce total Medicaid enrollment by 13.1 million people in 2035. The drop in Medicaid spending from the OBBBA-related enrollment reductions was partially offset by technical changes CBO made to the Medicaid baseline.

Medicaid costs per enrollee grew by 16 percent in 2025, which was more than CBO had anticipated. The agency attributes the cost per enrollee growth to a reported decrease in the average health status of Medicaid enrollees following the end of the COVID-era continuous eligibility policy.

CBO anticipates that payment rates for Medicaid managed care plans will begin to rise in 2026 because of this decrease in the average health status of enrollees, and the agency has updated the Medicaid baseline accordingly (see Figure 1).

Source: 红领巾瓜报 analysis of CBO鈥檚  and F reports.

Changes to CBO鈥檚 Medicare Baseline

Compared with its January 2025 baseline, CBO increased its projections of  by about $1 trillion (roughly $942 billion, by 红领巾瓜报 (红领巾瓜报) calculations). The main driver of that increase came from CBO鈥檚 updates to its Medicare Part D spending projections, which were increased to reflect higher than expected 2026 bids from private insurance plans that administer the Part D benefit. According to their 2026 bids, Part D plans anticipate a 35 percent increase in their annual per enrollee costs in 2026鈥攁 trend that CBO was not expecting and . Part D spending per beneficiary in 2035 is now projected to exceed $4,000, up from less than $3,000 in the January 2025 baseline (See Figure 2).

The agency鈥檚 Medicare Part A fee-for-service (FFS) spending projection increase was the result of larger than expected increases in 2025 enrollment and per enrollee spending. Those trends were also seen in Medicare Part B FFS but were partially offset by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services鈥檚 (CMS) recent reimbursement changes to skin substitute products. Overall, CBO estimates that the skin substitute reform issued in CMS鈥檚  and  final rules will save $245 billion over the 2026鈥2035 period, including the effects on the Medicare Advantage (MA) program (see Figure 3).

Finally, CBO reduced its spending projections for MA compared to the January 2025 baseline. This change was made to reflect lower-than-expected Medicare Advantage enrollment in 2025, although the spending implications of lower enrollment were partially offset by higher-than-expected bids in 2026 by providers of MA plans (see Figure 4).

Source: 红领巾瓜报 analysis of CBO鈥檚  and  reports.
Source: 红领巾瓜报 analysis of CBO鈥檚  and  reports.
Source: 红领巾瓜报 analysis of CBO鈥檚  and  reports

Contact an 红领巾瓜报 Expert Today

Interested in understanding how CBO鈥檚 latest baseline update affects the federal budgetary implications of certain Medicare or Medicaid policy topics or proposals? Contact our experts, Mark Desmaris and Rachel Matthews, to learn more about 红领巾瓜报鈥檚 鈥淐BO-style鈥 federal budgetary scoring work, which relies on The Moran Company鈥檚 long-standing methodology. [1]

Beyond federal budget scoring, 红领巾瓜报 is working with states, health plans, and providers to assess how changes in enrollee health status are affecting utilization, costs, and payment rates鈥攁nd what those trends may mean for Medicaid and MA organizations and providers. Our teams support states in evaluating managed care rate setting and program design, help Medicaid and MA plans anticipate risk and bid implications, and assist providers in understanding how changes in patient acuity could affect care delivery, contracting, and financial performance.

[1]Specifically, we apply our understanding of CBO precedents to predict how CBO will likely evaluate the budgetary impact of the legislation in question. We use our best judgment to adopt the assumptions CBO would tend to use, with the understanding that any variance in the assumptions CBO ultimately adopts could cause our estimate to differ from theirs.

Case Study Report: Lessons Learned from HealthySteps Technical Assistance in California

Download

This report synthesizes insights from multiple efforts to support the financial sustainability of HealthySteps sites in California, including federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), community clinics (non-FQHCs), private practices, and other settings. Led by the HealthySteps National Office and 红领巾瓜报 (红领巾瓜报), the technical assistance (TA) elevated challenges, strategies and best practices to achieve sustainability informed by learning collaboratives, individualized TA sessions, and financial modeling exercises. This report complements additional resources that the HS National Office and 红领巾瓜报 developed which are available via the HealthySteps (HS) Sustainability website.

Medicaid Changes in the OBBBA and Implications for the Marketplace and Individual Market in 2027

Download

In recent years, the individual market has undergone significant disruption. The expiration of enhanced premium tax credits (ePTC) at the end of 2025 and sweeping eligibility changes under the 2025 Budget Reconciliation Act (OBBBA) have reshaped鈥攁nd will continue to reshape鈥攖he individual market.

The number of changes facing states and issuers in coming years are significant. As a result, it is unsurprising that discussion and analysis on the individual market impacts of the new Medicaid requirements is limited and expected to result in large numbers of Medicaid beneficiaries being disenrolled. Between community engagement requirements (i.e., work requirements), increases in eligibility checks, and loss of eligibility for certain immigrant population, the expectation is that millions of people will leave Medicaid in 2027.

This brief explores how these coming changes will reshape coverage pathways and costs, and examines implications for consumer affordability and churn, issuer pricing and risk pools, and state administrative burdens鈥攁longside strategies for states, issuers, and policymakers to mitigate adverse effects.

Tracking Medicaid鈥檚 Growth: FFY 2025 Spending and T-MSIS Data Provide Insights on Managed Care Spending

Read Blog

This week, our鈥In Focus鈥痵ection highlights findings from a 红领巾瓜报 Information Services (红领巾瓜报IS) analysis of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) preliminary CMS-64 Medicaid expenditure report for federal fiscal year (FFY) 2025. The data show total medical services expenditures reached $971.4 billion across all states and territories, up 6.9 percent from FFY 2024. 

This CMS-64 spending detail provides important context as states prepare for their upcoming legislative sessions and begin implementing changes required under the 2025 budget reconciliation act (P.L. 119-21, OBBBA). Early fiscal and operational pressures will stem from changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and preparations for community engagement requirements for Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion enrollees. In subsequent years, pressures will intensify because of major changes to provider tax financing and new federal limits on state directed payments in 2027 and early 2028. 

In this article, we provide a deeper review of Medicaid spending, including the federal-state financing split. As Medicaid agencies prepare for upcoming spring sessions and anticipate potential program changes under OBBBA, it is notable that  report an at least fifty percent likelihood of a Medicaid budget shortfall in FFY 2026. 

Growth and Drivers in Medicaid Managed Care Spending 

The 红领巾瓜报IS analysis looks at CMS-64 preliminary estimates of Medicaid spending by state for FFY 2025. CMS  state expenditures through the automated Medicaid Budget and Expenditure System/State Children鈥檚 Health Insurance Budget and Expenditure System (MBES/CBES). 

While enrollment decreased for most states following the COVID-19 public health emergency unwinding, states saw an uptick in expenditures due to increased state directed payments, greater utilization and sicker populations, higher drug costs, increased provider rates, and greater use of long-term services and supports and behavioral health. 

Key findings from 红领巾瓜报IS鈥 analysis (see Table 1), include: 

  • Total Medicaid managed care spending (federal and state share聽combined)聽reached聽$550.5聽billion聽in聽FFY 2025,聽up from聽$517.5聽billion聽in聽FFY 2024.聽
  • This聽amount聽represents聽a聽6.4聽percent聽year-over-year increase from聽FFY 2024聽to聽FFY 2025.聽
  • Managed聽care聽accounted for 56.7聽percent聽of total Medicaid spending in聽FFY 2025, down聽0.3聽percentage points聽from the previous聽year.聽
  • The聽$33 billion聽increase from FFY 2024 to FFY 2025 exceeds the聽$9.4 billion聽increase seen the year prior, reflecting renewed growth following the unwinding transition period.聽

These figures include spending on comprehensive risk-based managed care organizations (MCOs), prepaid inpatient health plans (PIHPs), and prepaid ambulatory health plans (PAHPs). PIHPs and PAHPs refer to prepaid health plans that provide a subset of services, such as dental or behavioral health care. This total is exclusive of fee-based programs such as primary care case management models. 

Table 1. Medicaid MCO Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Medicaid Expenditures, FFY 2020鈥2025 (in millions) 

Annual Medicaid managed care expenditures have grown consistently with total Medicaid expenditures. After slower growth in FFY 2024鈥攚hich aligned with the post-COVID-19 policy unwinding period when many states completed eligibility redeterminations鈥擣FY 2025 again experienced an uptick in managed care growth (see Figure 1). 

Figure 1. Total and MCO Medicaid Expenditures, FFY 2020鈥2025 ($M)

Federal versus State Share Spending 

The preliminary FFY 2025 expenditure data provides a baseline before OBBBA鈥檚 changes are scheduled for implementation and as states continue to face Medicaid funding challenges. In FFY 2025, federal funding accounted for 64.2 percent of FFY 2025 spending, and non-federal matching funds accounted for 35.8 percent (see Table 2). Particularly later in 2027, 2028, and subsequent years, Medicaid expansion states stand to see disproportionally larger increases in their share of spending. 

Table 2. Federal versus State Share of Medicaid Expenditures, FFY 2020鈥2025 (in millions)

T-MSIS Data Adds Detail to CMS-64 MCO Spending 

To complement CMS-64 macro-spending trends, 红领巾瓜报 developed a methodology allowing us to use Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) data to approximate managed care spending by service category. Although T-MSIS enables more granular views (e.g., professional services, inpatient/outpatient hospital services, skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), HCBS, clinics, pharmaceuticals), the most recent dataset typically lags one to two years behind CMS-64 totals. 

红领巾瓜报鈥檚 analysis of the T-MSIS data shows that while managed care remains the dominant delivery system model for Medicaid, spending by provider types helps contextualize the CMS-64 report. Notably, the CMS-64 reports FFY25 data and our report below on T-MSIS disaggregation uses 2023 data. Although the T-MSIS and CMS-64 data are for different years, it still highlights the main components of the largest spending component of the CMS-64 with more recent data. 

The 2023 T-MSIS analysis shows the following: 

  • Professional fees are the lead spending category, with聽nearly聽30聽percent聽of spending directed聽toward聽payments to physicians and other practitioners (e.g., physician assistants, nurse practitioners). Given that T-MSIS data are built around billing codes, services that traditionally may be considered part of a bundled rate (i.e.,聽a large portion聽of physician services delivered in hospitals and clinics) are聽essentially unbundled聽and considered professional fees.聽
  • Hospital spending聽(inpatient plus outpatient), SNF聽costs, and professional fees聽together聽account for close to 75聽percent of spending in聽CY 2023.聽

Figure 2. T-MSIS Medicaid Spending by Service Category 2023 (MCO disaggregated plus FFS)

What to Watch 

Because Medicaid is such a big part of state government spending, outlays for Medicaid will always be a focus and challenge for states. Upcoming state legislative sessions and OBBBA driven changes will begin in 2026 with SNAP pressures and major operational preparations for community engagement requirements for expansion states. Preparations for new limits on provider taxes and state directed payments will likely begin immediately, but the true impacts will occur in 2027 and early 2028. States will need to tailor their programs under funding constraints. 

Connect with Us 

红领巾瓜报IS, a subscription-based tool that 红领巾瓜报 offers, provides state-by-state analysis of the CMS-64 data, Medicaid managed care enrollment trends, and state budget reporting. For more information about an 红领巾瓜报IS subscription, contact Andrea Maresca and Alona Nenko. For details on T-MSIS data, contact Matt Powers and Shreyas Ramani

Updated Analysis Compares Consumer Out-of-Pocket Spending of ACA Marketplace Enrollees to other Major Payers Using Claims Data

Download

红领巾瓜报 and Wakely, an 红领巾瓜报 Company, have released an updated Issue Brief to the comprehensive profile of ACA Marketplace enrollees that was based on claims data from nearly 6 million of the 24 million Marketplace enrollees.

The issue brief discusses these key questions:

  1. Do Marketplace enrollees spend more or less out-of-pocket relative to Medicare, ESI and Medicaid enrollees?
  2. How may the potential expiration of eAPTCs impact out-of-pocket costs?
  3. What are some initial considerations regarding overall healthcare affordability?

Please fill out this form to receive a copy of the update and issue brief.

Contact any of the report authors with further questions, or to discuss potential applications of this work for your organization.

The Future of Integrated Care Programs for Dually Eligible Individuals in Massachusetts: Key Takeaways from the Fall 2025 MAHP/红领巾瓜报 Policy Forum

Read Blog

红领巾瓜报 (红领巾瓜报) recently co-hosted a policy forum with the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans (MAHP), entitled Advancing Better Outcomes: How the One Care and SCO Programs Improve Health for Older Adults and People with Disabilities on Medicare and Medicaid. More than 100 key decision makers from MassHealth (Medicaid), health plans, providers, community-based organizations, and advocacy organizations attended the conference, elevating the value of the MassHealth and (SCO) programs to dually eligible individuals. The policy forum also provided an important opportunity for state legislators and their staff to learn about these complex programs.

MassHealth One Care and SCO Programs

Massachusetts鈥 One Care and the SCO programs currently serve more than individuals covered under MassHealth and Medicare, also known as dually eligible individuals. One Care is a population-specific program for dually eligible adults 21-64 years of age. SCO is a population-specific program for dually eligible older adults 65 and older, tailored to the needs of older adults. The One Care and SCO programs serve individuals with complex chronic conditions and disabilities, including mental health and substance use disorder needs, and high home-and-community-based service (HCBS) needs. The One Care and SCO programs advance independent living, recovery, and community living goals. Approximately 99 percent of One Care enrollees, and 95 percent of SCO enrollees, live in the community.

The One Care program is currently authorized as a Financial Alignment Initiative (FAI) demonstration program. The FAI demonstration ends December 31, 2025. MassHealth will continue the One Care program as a model. This transition from the FAI to a FIDE SNP model introduces changes to the program. A FIDE SNP model is a type of .

红领巾瓜报鈥檚 Role: Bringing National and State Expertise

In addition to creating the forum in partnership with MAHP, 红领巾瓜报 shared its national and state policy expertise and local market insights with attendees during a series of presentations. 红领巾瓜报 outlined ways in which the One Care and SCO programs offer more value to dually eligible individuals than the state鈥檚 fee-for-service (FFS) system.

The event focused on three key topics:

  • The national landscape for Medicare-Medicaid integrated care programs.
  • The value of the One Care and SCO programs and the role that health plans play in improving outcomes for adults who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid (“dually eligible”), and
  • The upcoming changes to the One Care and SCO programs, as reflected in the with MassHealth.

Key Takeaways from the MAHP-红领巾瓜报 Conference

Key Takeaway #1. Nationwide trends suggest that Medicare-Medicaid integrated care programs will face competition and financial pressures.

Forum attendees were very interested in the national trends. At the national level, D-SNPs have bipartisan support. At the same time, D-SNPs should expect competition from and innovation models developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI). CMMI models such as the Model and Model will compete with D-SNP models in some markets. Finally, presenters and panelists alike raised concerns about the financial risks that D-SNPs will face due to rising pharmacy costs and changes in Medicare payment methodologies.

Key Takeaway #2. The Massachusetts One Care and SCO programs provide significant value to dually eligible individuals in Massachusetts.

The One Care and SCO programs provide significant value to enrollees. As compared to FFS, Medicaid-Medicaid integrated care programs like One Care and SCO provide care coordination, a personal care plan, bundling prescriptions through a single provider, and other services.

Many forum attendees pointed out that the One Care program is one of the most advanced integrated care programs in the nation. One Care鈥檚 success is tied in part to the active and critical role that the plays in shaping program policy. For more than a decade, the One Care Implementation Council and MassHealth have worked in partnership to improve the program. As shared by the : 鈥淭he Commonwealth intends to preserve the Implementation Council鈥檚 role in the next phase of One Care, and to continue engaging the council as an essential partner in policy and program change, monitoring, and oversight.鈥

Key Takeaway #3. Over the last two decades, SCO and One Care plans have established many innovations.

The forum highlighted many innovations in these programs, from primary and to . It also provided an opportunity to talk about the important role and commitment that the plans have in emergency situations to ensure that members are safe in the face of a community crisis.

Panelists see many opportunities for plans to continue to evolve and improve outcomes and equity. For example, the One Care program has significant opportunities to address the behavioral health needs of dually eligible adults. Dually eligible adults with mental health and/or substance use disorder diagnoses are at higher risk of an emergency department visit and inpatient stay than other enrollees. Health plan per member per month (PMPM) spending on inpatient services for those with a behavioral health condition is much higher as a share of the total PMPM than other populations. The 红领巾瓜报 data pointed to a need for further innovation in the mental health arena to advance better outcomes of quality of life and costs.

Key Takeaway #4. Conference attendees focused on the importance of addressing enrollees鈥 social determinants of health needs.

Throughout the day, the importance of community and addressing the social determinants of health (SDOH) was a common theme. Aging and disability leaders spoke about the importance of community organizations such as , , including peer support since most  One Care and SCO individuals live in the community.

Many One Care and SCO eligible individuals are often just one unmet health related social need away from the risk of hospitalization or institutionalization. Other attendees underscored the risk that enrollee living situations and recovery can become instantly unstable due to the death of an important family member. One aging leader described her role as 鈥渢riaging risk.鈥 Other leaders from the disability community urged plans to use to improve plan and provider attention to identify and address the SDOH needs.

Looking Ahead

As Massachusetts prepares for the 2026 One Care and SCO contract year, the forum underscored the progress made over the past decade and the opportunities ahead to improve care coordination, collect z codes, and invest in outcomes-driven partnerships. Massachusetts is well-positioned to continue leading the nation in designing integrated care programs that improve health and support community living for older adults and people with disabilities.

红领巾瓜报 looks forward to supporting all organizations including state Medicaid programs and health plan and provider associations as they convene stakeholders to improve their integrated care programs. Our expertise includes program planning, strategy and implementation, technical support and evaluation, and state-specific knowledge to make projects successful. Please contact Ellen Breslin, Rob Buchanan, and Julie Faulhaber for more information on how 红领巾瓜报 can help your organization.

Summary Facts About the One Care and SCO Programs
The One Care and SCO programs are population-specific programs, serving more than 125,000 individuals with MassHealth plus Medicare coverage.   MassHealth designed the One Care and SCO programs around the specific needs, preferences and goals of adults and older adults.The One Care program enrolls dually eligible adults with disabilities, ages 21-64 at the time of enrollment, covered under MassHealth Standard or CommonHealth and Medicare (Parts A and B, and eligible for Part D). Enrollees in One Care have multiple chronic conditions and disabilities including significant mental health and substance use disorder needs. The SCO program enrolls dually eligible adults ages 65 and older, covered under MassHealth Standard and Medicare (Parts A and B, and eligible for Part D). SCO enrollees have significant chronic conditions, many of which are associated with aging.
MassHealth launched the SCO program in 2004 and One Care in 2013.   The One Care program currently operates as a Financial Alignment Initiative (FAI) demonstration. The One Care and the SCO programs combine MassHealth & Medicare benefits into a single plan with one card and one care team. One Care covers medical, mental health, and prescription medications, plus support for daily tasks and independent living and recovery. Care coordinators help members stay healthy and get the services they need.
The One Care and SCO Programs Continue to Evolve. The FAI demonstration authority ends in 2025. Massachusetts will shift from the demonstration to a Fully Integrated Dual Eligible Special Needs Plan (FIDE-SNP) structure. The SCO program currently operates as a FIDE SNP model. The state reprocured the One Care and SCO plan network. The state selected five One Care plans and six SCO plans. New contracts for One Care and SCO plans start January 1, 2026.The new contracts create several changes including changes in eligibility for the program and enrollment processes, benefits, and financial payment provisions.
Ready to talk?