Weekly Roundup -
June 10, 2026
Smart. Strategic. Essential.
Unmatched Healthcare Insights from ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨,
Leavitt Partners & Wakely.
Featured:
Webinar Replay – Summer Webinar Series: Understanding Work and Community Engagement Requirements and New Section 1115 Guidance
ACCESS WEBINARFinal 2027 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters Notice: What States and Issuers Need to Know
READ BRIEFTrending: In Focus
Act Now to Implement Community Engagement Requirements
On June 2, 2026, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the highly anticipated Interim Final Rule (IFR) on implementing the Medicaid work and community engagementÌýrequirementsÌýset forth inÌýthe 2025 budget reconciliation act, P.L. 119-21.ÌýStates are expected to implement the requirements by January 1, 2027,ÌýleavingÌýMedicaidÌýauthorities, health plans, providers, and community-based partnersÌýwith a compressed timelineÌýtoÌýdesign, test, and deploy new workflows thatÌýwillÌýfundamentally change how eligibility and compliance are administered.
This article builds on ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ (ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨) colleagues’ ongoing analysis of federal Medicaid policy changes stemming from the Working Families Tax Cut Act and evolving federal priorities (see Connecting the DotsÌýhereÌýandÌýhere)Ìýand explores the implications forÌýenrollees,Ìýstate agencies,Ìýhealth plans,Ìýand providers.Ìý
Community engagement requirementsÌýcreate risk and exposure forÌýall ofÌýthese interest-holders,Ìýopening them toÌýthe possibility ofÌýincreased enrollment churn, particularly during theÌýearly stagesÌýof implementationÌýasÌýenrollees and administrators adapt to new processes.ÌýEvenÌýMedicaid enrolleesÌýwho meet compliance requirements or qualify for exemptionsÌýcould experienceÌýtemporary coverage losses or disruptionsÌýbecause ofÌýdelays in documentation, notice response, or case processing.Ìý
Plans and providers, meanwhile,ÌýmayÌýencounterÌýdownstreamÌýeffectsÌýonÌýcapitation rate adequacy, financial and membership forecasting, risk adjustment, care management continuity, quality performance, and network stability.Ìý
From Policy to Practice: A Systemwide Operational ShiftÌý
Many elementsÌýof the IFRÌýalign with statutory provisions;Ìýhowever,ÌýitÌýintroduces new operational expectations that will reshape eligibility processes, including:Ìý
- Structured verification and documentation requirementsÌý
- Expanded exemption frameworks tied to functional ability to workÌý
- New reporting and oversight obligationsÌý
- Increased reliance on enrollee notifications and engagementÌý
Collectively, these changes introduce a new layer of administrativeÌýexpectationsÌýthat extend beyond traditional eligibility and enrollment functions and require coordination acrossÌýstate and localÌýagencies,Ìýhealth plans and providers, and community partners.Ìý
Notably, CMS has provided targeted flexibilities—particularly through income-based compliance pathways—which will allow states to leverage existing data sources and potentially reduce administrative burden, if implemented effectively.Ìý
States NeedÌýto BuildÌýan Operational FoundationÌý
For state Medicaid agencies, the immediate priority is translating federal requirements into scalable, consistent processes.Ìý
Key actions include:Ìý
- Redesign eligibility andÌýcomplianceÌýworkflows.ÌýStates will need toÌýidentifyÌýaffected populations, track compliance,ÌýadjudicateÌýexemptions and hardships, and manage appeals—all within tight implementation timelines.Ìý
- Invest in verification infrastructure.ÌýAlthough automation opportunities exist,Ìýparticularly using income and existing eligibility data,Ìýmany determinations (e.g., medical frailty, caregiving, hardship) will require individualized review and new documentation standards.Ìý
- Strengthen cross-agency coordination and data integration.ÌýEffective implementation will depend on integrating data from workforce, social services, and other programs to support compliance and reduce manual processes.Ìý
- Develop robust communication strategies.ÌýExperience from prior Medicaid initiativesÌýdemonstratesÌýthat coverage loss often results from administrative barriers,Ìýnot ineligibility,Ìýmaking clear, proactive communication essential.Ìý
- Balance automation and administrative complexity.ÌýStates that effectivelyÌýleverageÌýautomation and streamline enrollee-facing processes will be better positioned toÌýmaintainÌýcoverage continuity while meeting federal requirements.Ìý
Implications for Health Plans: Expanding the Role of Member EngagementÌý
Health plans will play a pivotal role in implementation, although they cannot determine enrollee compliance with the new requirements. StatesÌýrely onÌýplans toÌýidentifyÌýmembers whoÌýmay beÌýsubject to community engagement requirements,ÌýtoÌýassistÌýwith member communications, andÌýtoÌýconnect membersÌýwithÌýresources that support compliance orÌýexemptionÌýeligibility.ÌýEven though these activities occur outside the traditional managed care financing framework, plans may beÌýcalled uponÌýtoÌýaccomplishÌýthe following:Ìý
- Enhance outreach and education capabilities.ÌýPlans are often the primary point of contact for members and will need to support awareness, compliance, and navigation of new requirements.Ìý
- IdentifyÌýand support at-risk populations.ÌýPlans can help flag members likely to qualify for exemptions andÌýassistÌýwith documentation and care coordination to reduce inappropriate disenrollment.Ìý
- Prepare for enrollment volatility.ÌýIncreased churnÌýdriven by documentation delays and administrative barriersÌýmay affect financial performance,ÌýcareÌýcontinuity, and quality outcomes.Ìý
- Align with state expectations and funding constraints.ÌýBecause these activities fall outside traditionalÌýMedicaidÌýbenefits, states and plans must carefully define roles, accountability, and funding mechanisms.Ìý
Implications for Providers: A New Interface with Eligibility SystemsÌý
Providers,Ìýparticularly safetyÌýnet organizations,Ìýwill be directly affected by new documentation and enrollee support responsibilitiesÌýand should be preparedÌýto address the following:Ìý
- Expand administrative and clinical workflows.ÌýProviders will increasingly be asked to support medical frailty determinations, document functional limitations, and provide verification related to exemptions.Ìý
- Prepare for increased administrative burden.ÌýNew documentation requirements and coordination with plans and states willÌýrequireÌýoperational adjustments, particularly for organizations serving large Medicaid populations.Ìý
- Mitigate impacts of coverage disruption.ÌýGaps in coverage—often tied to procedural barriers—may disrupt care continuity, particularly for highÌýneed populations, and increase uncompensated care.Ìý
- Serve as a critical partner in engagement efforts.ÌýProviders are uniquely positioned toÌýidentifyÌýat-risk individuals, educate patients, and support compliance,Ìýmaking them essential to implementation success.Ìý
Many of the most complex determinations—such as medical frailty and caregiving—cannot be fully automated, requiring nuanced policy design and consistent operational execution.ÌýAs a result, successful implementation will depend onÌýthe following:Ìý
- Standardized documentation and review processesÌý
- Integrated data systems and verification pathwaysÌý
- Clear division of responsibilitiesÌýacrossÌýinterest-holdersÌý
- Coordination across policy, operations, and frontline personnelÌý
Act NowÌýtoÌýInfluenceÌýCommunity Engagement RolloutÌý
States and stakeholders face dual, immediate priorities—preparing for implementation and engaging in the federal rulemaking process. CMSÌýisÌýacceptingÌýcomments on the IFR throughÌýJuly 31, 2026, creating a critical opportunity to shape final policy while building operational readiness. At the same time, the compressed timeline to 2027ÌýforÌýimplementationÌýunderscores the need for rapid decision-making on policy design, systems investments, and partner engagement.Ìý
The Medicaid community engagement requirementsÌýrepresentÌýone of the most significant operational transformations in the program’sÌý60-yearÌýhistory.ÌýTo succeed, organizationsÌýshouldÌýact early,Ìýcoordinate withÌýinterest-holders, and design implementation strategies that balance compliance, administrative efficiency, and coverage continuity.Ìý
Now is the time to:Ìý
- Establish cross-functional governance and implementation plansÌý
- Evaluate verification strategies and data integration opportunitiesÌý
- Define roles and expectations across plans, providers, and partnersÌý
- Develop targeted communication and engagement strategiesÌý
- Conduct readiness assessments and system testingÌý
ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ can actively support state policymakers, health plans, and providers as they in navigate these challenges. For details, access the full ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ÌýIssueÌýBriefÌýand explore theÌýCommunity Engagement State Support Hub.
New Funding Approaches Prompt Maryland Healthcare Leaders to Reassess Strategies for Affordable Coverage
Strategies to improve healthcare delivery, sustain coverage, and manage growing cost pressuresÌýresulting fromÌýfederal policy changes and state budget dynamicsÌýwere key topicsÌýof discussion at this year’sÌý, May 21, 2026, in Baltimore, MD. Hosted byÌýÌý(SOR), an ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ÌýCompany,ÌýtheÌýprogramÌýconvenedÌýstateÌýpolicymakersÌýand leaders ofÌýhealth plans,ÌýproviderÌýgroups,ÌýandÌýcommunity-based organizationsÌýtoÌýexamine the most pressing healthcare issues inÌýMaryland.Ìý
Across sessions, participants explored key policy priorities, including Maryland’s implementation of the Rural Health Transformation Program (RHTP), efforts to stabilize and expand healthÌýinsurance coverage, andÌýearly lessons fromÌýimplementingÌýtheÌýAHEAD (Achieving Healthcare Efficiency through Accountable Design)Ìýtotal cost of careÌý(TCOC)Ìýmodel.Ìý
Sustaining MedicaidÌýand Marketplace AccessibilityÌýAmid Federal Policy ChangesÌý
Throughout the conference speakers and attendees engaged on myriad issues and concerns resulting from the 2025 budget reconciliation act, now referred to as the Working Families Tax Cuts (WFTC) Act, and its potential impact on state Medicaid programs and coverage stability. Maryland Deputy Secretary for Healthcare Financing and Medicaid Director Perrie Briskin joined Johanna Fabian-Marks, Deputy Executive Director of the Maryland Health Benefit Exchange (MHBE), and Melissa Horn, Director of State Legislative Affairs at the Arthritis Foundation, to examine strategies for mitigating coverage loss and maintaining affordability.Ìý
Speakers emphasized the need for improved coordination between Medicaid and the MHBE, including clear and consistent consumer communications and targeted outreach in counties most affected by federal policy changes.Ìý
For example, Maryland leaders described several innovative approaches the MHBE is using to help people in the state maintain Marketplace coverage, including state-funded subsidies to offset the expiration of enhanced premium tax credits, streamlined auto-renewals, and simplified enrollment pathways for individuals identified as uninsuredÌýbased on theirÌýtax and employmentÌýrecords.ÌýThe state reported an 8 percent decline in enrollment in AprilÌý2026, noting that without these mitigation strategies, enrollment could have dropped by as much as one-third.Ìý
The MHBE is using artificial intelligenceÌý(AI)Ìýto support document verificationÌýand isÌýdeploying a chatbot to help consumers navigateÌýcommon questions.Ìý
On the Medicaid side, the stateÌýis consultingÌýmultiple data sources—including CRISPÌý(Chesapeake Regional Information System for our Patients), labor, and education data—toÌýverifyÌýeligibilityÌýand,Ìýcompliance withÌýcommunity engagementÌýrequirementsÌýtoÌýreduce administrative burdens.Ìý
Rural Health Transformation Program Implementation and Early PrioritiesÌý
Maryland’s RHTP, supported byÌýnearly $168.2 millionÌýin first-year funding from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS),Ìýwas a hot topic at the conference.ÌýState leaders and implementation partners emphasized the program’s role in addressing rural health disparities, strengthening care delivery infrastructure, and improving chronic disease outcomes.Ìý
Elizabeth Kromm, PhD,ÌýAssistant Secretary, Maryland Department of Health,Ìýoutlined theÌýthree pillarsÌýofÌýthe state’sÌýRHTP plan:Ìý
- Expand the rural healthcare workforceÌý
- Increase access to integrated primary, specialty, and behavioral health servicesÌý
- Address the underlying drivers of chronic disease through nutrition and food system interventionsÌý
Together, these initiatives highlight Maryland’s focus on both clinical care delivery and broader population health strategies.Ìý
State officialsÌýalso discussed theÌýfunding opportunitiesÌýÌýinÌýApril 2026, one of which seeks to support care delivery innovation, improve chronic condition management, and advance value-based care models.ÌýSpeakers emphasized that connection is central to the program’s success—both the strength of community relationships, the connections enabled through technology, and the integrationÌýofÌýclinical and nonclinical services.Ìý
AHEAD Model: Advancing Total Cost of Care and Population HealthÌý
Maryland’s participation in CMS’s AHEADÌýModelÌýrepresentsÌýaÌýsignificantÌýshiftÌýtowardÌýhealthcare cost containment and system transformation. AsÌýone ofÌýthe first states to implementÌýtheÌýframework, Maryland is testing a statewide approach to managingÌýTCOCÌýwhile improving quality and population health outcomes.Ìý
A panel discussion including leaders from the MedChi, Johns Hopkins, CareFirst Blue Shield, and Kaiser Permanente, addressed implementation considerations, open policy implications, and how providers and payers were approaching these changes in payment for healthcare services. Reimbursement strategies for primary care services were still uncertain and may differ significantly from those used under the Maryland TCOC model. Panelists also discussed what this model means in the broader healthcare environment of reductions in Medicaid payments resulting from the reconciliation legislation and additional funding coming from the Rural Health Transformation Fund. They also described how Maryland could serve as an example for other states working to implement AHEAD in the coming years.Ìý
Speakers noted that successful implementation willÌýrequireÌýstrong coordination among providers, payers, and state agencies,Ìýand more details are necessary toÌýfulfill the requirements.ÌýThe model’s 10-yearÌýtimeline positions Maryland as a leading testÌýcase forÌýfuture federal and state efforts to scaleÌýTCOCÌýapproaches.Ìý
AIÌýin Healthcare: From Innovation to Real-World ImpactÌý
AI’sÌýrole in healthcare delivery and policy continues to evolve, with growing attention on its practical applications and regulatory implications. A session led by ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ (ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨) PrincipalÌýBrandon Greife, JD,ÌýandÌýspeakersÌýfromÌýMicrosoft AI, the Pair Team, the Center for Virtual Care, andÌýb.wellÌýConnected HealthÌýexploredÌýhow healthcare organizationsÌýconceptualizeÌýAI use cases to deploy solutions that demonstrate measurable impact.Ìý
AI holds promise for improving care delivery, but realizing that potential requires navigating ethical, regulatory, and operational challenges. Mr.ÌýGreifeÌýled a panel discussionÌýon howÌýthe healthcare industryÌýisÌýtransitioning from abstract use cases for AI towardÌýevaluatingÌýthe real-world impact of deployed solutions.Ìý
Session speakersÌýalsoÌýexploredÌýhowÌýhealthcare is advancingÌýfromÌýAI tools that support clinicians andÌýpayersÌýtoÌýpatient-facing AIÌýthat supports care navigation,Ìýchronic disease management, andÌýcommunity outreach. They rounded out the sessionÌýwith a focus on fundamentals of healthcare—concepts like data quality, clinical trust, patient safety, and demonstrated value at the point of care.Ìý
Looking AheadÌý
IfÌýyou are looking forÌýstrategiesÌýandÌýsolutionsÌýto address urgent healthcare policy and operational challenges, ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ experts are available to helpÌýyouÌýnavigate these complex changesÌýandÌýidentifyÌýpractical paths forward.Ìý
ThroughÌýtheÌý,ÌýÌýpartnership events, and otherÌýºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ conveningsÌýacross the country, we connect state leaders, providers, health plans, and community stakeholders to shareÌýinsights, elevate lessons,Ìýand advance solutions. Join us at an upcoming event—including our nextÌýºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ National ConferenceÌýinÌýNew Orleans, LAÌýonÌýOctober 5-7, 2026—or exploreÌýadditionalÌýopportunities to engage with ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ and access the full schedule of conferences and resources.Ìý
State of Reform develops its conference agendas through collaboration with ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ subject matter experts/market leads and stakeholders across the public and private sectors, including state officials, community-based organizations, providers, payers, and more.Ìý
Federal Policy News
Fueled By Weekly Health Intelligence
FY 2027 Funding Debate Takes Shape for HHS, NIH, CDC, and FDA
In recent weeks, the US House of Representatives has been focusing on advancing appropriations bills to fund the government for fiscal year (FY) 2027, including US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its operating agencies.
Last week, the House Appropriations Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies (LHHS) Subcommittee held aÌýÌýof the FY 2027 LHHS AppropriationsÌý. The subcommittee advanced the legislation to the full Appropriations Committee with a vote of 11 to 7, without amendment. The bill provides an overall 4 percent reduction in discretionary funding for HHS, versus the 12.5 percent reduction proposed in the President’s FY 2027 budget. TheÌýÌýlanguage again acknowledges that the Administration proposedÌýto reorganizeÌýHHS, includingÌýconsolidatingÌýseveral agencies into a new Administration for a Healthy America. As in last year’sÌýconferencedÌýreport, the House Appropriations Committee states that, “The CommitteeÌýapplaudsÌýthese efforts to improve efficiency while reducing waste, fraud, and abuse. The Committee notes that the authorizing committees ofÌýjurisdictionÌýhave not yet had the opportunity to consider every reorganizational proposal.â€� As such, the appropriations bill and committee report “do not make significant changes to the organizational structure of the agencies funded herein.â€�Ìý
 Specific HHS fundingÌýÌýinclude:Ìý
- $48.8 billionÌýin discretionary funding for NIH, a $100 million increase from FY 2026 andÌý$5.8 billionÌýincrease from the President’s budget request;Ìý
- $6.7 billionÌýin discretionary funding for CDC, aÌý$1.0 billionÌýdecrease from FY 2026 and $582 million increase from the President’s budget request;Ìý
- $8.1 billionÌýin discretionary funding for HRSA, a decrease of $877.8 million from FY 2026 andÌý$1.9 billionÌýincrease from the President’s budget request;ÌýÌý
- $3.6 billionÌýin program level funding for ASPR, a $44.0 million decrease from FY 2026 and $311.5 million increase from the President’s budget request; andÌý
- $7.3 billionÌýin program level funding for SAMHSA, a $145.3 million decrease from FY 2026 and $609.1 million increase from the President’s budget request.Ìý
 Additionally, on June 4, the House passedÌý, the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027, by a vote of 213 to 210. The bill reduces overall discretionary spending for the agencies by 1.4 percent. For FDA, the bill increased the overall budget toÌý$7.1 billion, a 4.4 percent increase from FY 2026. This includesÌý$3.36 billionÌý(a 5 percent increase) in discretionary budget authority andÌý$3.74 billionÌý(a 3.8 percent increase) in definite user fees. The Senate Appropriations Committee has yet to mark up its version of the legislation, which was slated for June 4 but delayed. The two versions of the legislation willÌýultimately haveÌýto be reconciled before being sent to the President’s desk for signature.Ìý
FDA’s New Priority Voucher Program Draws Praise and Questions
On June 4, FDA held aÌýÌýonÌý. The CNPV program was originally established under the leadership of then-FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, who has since left the role, with the goal of expediting drug product reviews for companies focused on national priorities including public health crisis, innovative cures, large unmet needs, onshoring, and affordability. During his tenure, the CNPV program was met withÌýÌýfromÌý, including theÌýÌýof the Senate HELP Committee and House Energy and Commerce Committee. The June 4 public hearing included a listening panel comprised of leaders from the Office of the Commissioner, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), and the Oncology Center of Excellence who heard remarks and responded to questions from stakeholders including pharmaceutical manufacturers and physician and patient advocacy organizations. Many of these stakeholders praised the program’s potential to accelerate patient access to criticalÌýtherapies, butÌýalso expressed concerns regarding the transparency around the program’s procedures, as the criteria to be selected for a voucher is not publicly available, leaving many sponsors of therapies without a predictable outcome of their voucher application. One commentator also expressed concern that, without formal and transparent regulatory processes in place, approvals made through the program could be subject to legal challenges. Other commentors expressed the desire to include more career officials as well as patients and physicians involved in the approval process for therapies selected by the CNPV program, including specialists with subject matterÌýexpertiseÌýspecific to the patient population.ÌýÌý
 In addition to the hearing, FDA hasÌýestablishedÌýaÌýÌýfor comments on the CNPV program including public views on the scope of the program, potential changes to the scope, the selection process, timeline for product reviews, and metrics to evaluate the program. Comments must beÌýsubmittedÌýby June 29, 2026, at 11:59pm ET.ÌýÌý
What the Return of Schedule F Means for Federal Health Agencies
On June 3, President TrumpÌýÌýan Executive Order (EO) to reclassifyÌýnearly 8,000Ìýfederal employee titles as Schedule F,â€� or “Schedule Policy/Career.â€� Under the rescheduling, individuals in “confidential, policy-determining,Ìýpolicy-making, and policy-advocating roles (policy-influencing positions)â€� will now considered a separate schedule of federal employees that can be “removed for misconduct or poor performance.â€�Ìý
 The EO includesÌýanÌýÌýdetailing which positions across the U.S. government will beÌýimpactedÌýand directs the head of each agency to notify employees of their new placement as Schedule Policy/Career and to conform agency records accordingly within one week of the order.Ìý
 It is estimated thatÌýapproximately 400Ìýpositions within HHS will be subject to ScheduleÌýF reclassification.ÌýÌý
- At NIH, deputy directors and branch chiefs will be affected by Schedule F, whichÌýimpactsÌýoversight of grant portfolios and project management.ÌýÌý
- At CDC, a wider range of officials will have their positions reclassified, including researchers, biologists, epidemiologists, public health officials, and communication specialists.ÌýÌý
- At FDA, the shift willÌýimpactÌýa number ofÌýcross-cutting staff, including deputy division directors who oversee review staff, senior health policy analysts and advisors, senior science policy analysts and advisors, public health advisors, communications officers, and senior congressional affairs specialists.ÌýÌý
- At CMS, health insurance specialists, who oversee federal health insurance programs, and budget analysts will be reclassified as Schedule Policy/Career.ÌýÌý
Ready to talk about your organization's challenges?
Schedule a ConsultationState Policy News
Idaho Announces First Round of RHTP Funding Opportunities
The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (DHW)  on June 9, 2026, that the first round of funding opportunities for the Rural Health Transformation Program (RHTP) is open for Project Management Support, the Perinatal Quality Collaborative, and OB Readiness. The OB readiness funding opportunity makes up to $1.2 million available for one organization that would serve as the lead entity supporting rural providers to enhance obstetric readiness at both birthing and non-birthing facilities, as well as help launch a quality improvement initiative with an Obstetric Emergency Readiness Resource Kit. The Perinatal Quality Collaborative funding opportunity will give up to $2.4 million to one organization that will serve as the lead entity to help increase the number of rural hospitals completing one or more perinatal collaborative initiatives by December 31, 2030. Applications for both opportunities are due July 10, 2026.ÌýÌý
Illinois Finalizes $431B Medicaid Managed Care Awards, Setting Stage for Operational and Market Changes
The Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family ServicesÌýÌýon June 8, 2026, a notice of award for the HealthChoice Illinois Medicaid managed care procurement to incumbents CVS/Aetna Better Health, HCSC/Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, Centene/Meridian Health Plan, and Molina, along with non-incumbent Humana, for statewide contracts and incumbent Cook County Health/CountyCare Health Plan for the Cook County-only contract.Ìý
The contracts include a 4.5-yearÌýinitialÌýterm and a 5.5-year renewal term, with a total estimated award amount ofÌý$431.4 billionÌýfor 10 years. Plans will cover families and children, Medicaid expansion adults, specialÌýneedsÌýchildren, individuals with disabilities, and other Medicaid-eligible individuals who are not eligible for Medicare. Each plan will also be required to execute two contracts: the HCI Model Contract for Federally Funded Managed Care Services and the HCI Model Contract for State Funded Managed Care Services, to comply with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2025-2026 Medicaid Managed Care Rate Development Guide, which requires state-funded services to be placed in a distinct contract vehicle. This procurement focused on the delivery of benefits and services for Medicaid enrollees with complex medical and behavioral health needs; maternal and reproductive health; preventative care; home and community-based services; pharmacy services; social determinants of health; NEMT; and careÌýcoordinationÌýamong others.
Montana Advances Work on Medicaid Community Engagement Requirements to Meet July 1 Deadline
TheÌýMontana Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS)Ìýis movingÌýforwardÌýwith its July 1 deadline to , despite new questions that have risen after the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released an interim final rule on the new provision.ÌýAdvocates expressed concern over the way people are determined to be medically frail. The new guidance states that individuals must prove they are unable to work in addition to having a diagnosis, but it does not specify how an individual could prove their inability to work. DPHHS officials stated that the new guidelines do not change the implementation timeline and they are working on defining what conditions are considered medically frail.Ìý
North Dakota Governor Announces Medicaid Oversight Changes
North Dakota Governor Kelly Armstrong announced multiple changes toÌýÌýin response to the federal government’s call to revalidate high risk Medicaid providers.ÌýThe state’s Health and Human Services (HHS) will expand oversight of qualified service providers, non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) providers, and 1915(i) home and community-based service providers starting July 1, 2026. The increased oversight will include more frequent provider revalidation, stricter enrollment rules, additional competency checks, and increased site visits. In addition, North Dakota is pausing enrollments of NEMT providers statewide as well as other providers in Cass and Burleigh counties.Ìý
Ohio Ramps up Medicaid Program Integrity Initiative with Provider Suspensions and Fraud Room
The Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM)  on June 4, 2026,ÌýthatÌýit is suspending 49 high-risk home health Medicaid providers that haveÌýexhibitedÌýred flags for fraud. The suspensions follow an executive order from Governor Mike DeWine that allows ODM to suspend payments based on credible allegations. As part of the state’s wider efforts to combat fraud, waste, and abuse, Ohio also  that it is opening a state-specific “Medicaid Fraud Roomâ€� to prevent andÌýlocateÌýfraud.Ìý
Private Market News
Fueled By
Inspector General Finds Millions in Potential Overpayments to Medicare Advantage Plans
The Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services released findings fromÌýits ofÌýpayment toÌýMedicare Advantage (MA) plans. According to the OIG, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesÌýmay haveÌýmadeÌýabout $462 million in overpaymentsÌýto MA plansÌýin 2021 due to unsupported acute stroke diagnoses that were not backed by medical records.
Our Insights
Fueled By Experts Across Our ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ Companies
ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨
A Summer Webinar Series (July 15): Understanding Work and Community Engagement Requirements
ThisÌýwebinarÌýseries will deliverÌýtimelyÌýanalysis and actionable insights on the evolving policy and operational environment affecting Medicaid funding, enrollment, and access to services. Each session will feature up-to-the-moment information and perspectives from our subject matter experts, with content tailored to reflect the latest federal guidance, waiver activity, litigation, state implementation decisions, and market developments.
A Summer Webinar Series (August 12): How New Program Integrity Expectations Affect Medicaid Payments
ThisÌýwebinarÌýseries will deliverÌýtimelyÌýanalysis and actionable insights on the evolving policy and operational environment affecting Medicaid funding, enrollment, and access to services. Each session will feature up-to-the-moment information and perspectives from our subject matter experts, with content tailored to reflect the latest federal guidance, waiver activity, litigation, state implementation decisions, and market developments.
Final 2027 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters: What States and Issuers Need to Know
What are the changes in the payment notice for 2027? On May 15, 2026, theÌýDepartment of Health and Human Services (HHS)Ìýand theÌýCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)Ìýreleased the finalÌýNotice of Benefit and Payment Parameters (NBPP) for 2027, setting key rules for theÌýindividual and small group health insurance markets. This report explains the most importantÌý2027 Payment NoticeÌýchanges forÌýhealth care payers,Ìýissuers,Ìýstate regulators, andÌýstate-based exchanges—including what CMS finalized, what changed from the proposed rule, what takes effect in 2026, 2027, and 2028, and what the rule signals for future marketplace policy.
Leavitt Partners
Opportunities to Address Health-Related Social Needs in Medicaid Remain Possible and Prevalent
Medicaid programs are the primary provider of healthcare benefits to tens of millions of Americans with limited incomes and resources, many of whomÌýmayÌýexperience food and nutrition insecurity and otherÌýhealth-related social needs (HRSNs), which have a significant impact on healthcare spending and health outcomes.
Vital Viewpoints Podcast
The Coverage Gap Grows: ACA Changes Reverberate Across Healthcare
Listen HereRFP Calendar
RFP Calendar
| Date | State/Program | Event | Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date: June 24, 2026 | State/Program: Wisconsin LTC GSR 3 | Event: Awards | Beneficiaries: 56,000 (all GSR) |
| Date: Summer 2026 | State/Program: Illinois Foster Care | Event: RFP Release | Beneficiaries: 33,000 |
| Date: July 1, 2026 | State/Program: Hawaii Community Care Services | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: 5,500 |
| Date: July 28, 2026 | State/Program: Nevada Children's Specialty | Event: Awards | Beneficiaries: NA |
| Date: August 2026 | State/Program: Indiana | Event: RFP Release | Beneficiaries: 1,400,000 |
| Date: January 1, 2027 | State/Program: Illinois | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: 2,400,000 |
| Date: January 1, 2027 | State/Program: Nevada CO D-SNP | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: 88,000 |
| Date: January 1, 2027 | State/Program: Wisconsin LTC GSR 3 | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: 56,000 (all GSR) |
| Date: January 1, 2027 | State/Program: Illinois Tailored Care Management Program | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: 22,400 |
| Date: July 1, 2027 | State/Program: Nevada Children's Specialty | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: NA |
| Date: January 1, 2028 | State/Program: Wisconsin LTC GSR 4,6 | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: 56,000 (all GSR) |
| Date: Fall 2027 | State/Program: Oregon | Event: RFP Release | Beneficiaries: 1,200,000 |
| Date: 2028 | State/Program: North Carolina | Event: RFP Release | Beneficiaries: 2,200,000 |
| Date: 2029 | State/Program: California | Event: RFP Release | Beneficiaries: NA |