Weekly Roundup -
August 19 , 2026
Smart. Strategic. Essential.
Unmatched Healthcare Insights from ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨,
Leavitt Partners & Wakely.
Featured:
Webinar Replay – Rural Health Transformation Program: Beyond the Grant Approval Phase – Implementing for Sustainability
ACCESS WEBINARTrending: In Focus
Connecting the Dots: Medicaid Program Integrity Enters a New Era of Strategy and Operational Readiness
There is no shortage of news, federal activity, and operational urgencyÌýconcerningÌýfraud, waste, and abuseÌý(FWA)Ìýin healthcare. AcrossÌýMedicare,ÌýMedicaid, the Affordable Care Act Marketplaces, and other federallyÌýfundedÌýhealth programs, theÌýexecutive branchÌýis advancingÌýa moreÌýaggressiveÌýprogramÌýintegrityÌýagenda.ÌýThe US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), including the Centers for MedicareÌý& Medicaid Services (CMS) andÌýHHS Office of Inspector General,Ìýas well asÌýtheÌýUSÌýDepartment of Justice,Ìýare placingÌýgreater emphasis on payment accuracy, provider and vendor oversight, data-driven detection, and defensible compliance processes.Ìý
As scrutiny intensifies, organizations across theÌýhealthcareÌýecosystem areÌýchallengedÌýto move beyond traditional audit and recovery activities toward a more proactive, enterprise-wide approach to managing riskÌýand preventing FWA.ÌýAlthoughÌýthese trends affect all healthcare stakeholders, the implications for Medicaid are particularly significant given the program’s scale, complexity, and reliance on partnerships among state agencies, managed care organizations, providers, and technology vendors.Ìý
To better understand how organizations should respond, Jennifer ColamonicoÌýconnected withÌýClint Eisenhower, Regional Director at ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ (ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨), and Jennifer Bridgeforth, Associate Principal at ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨. The discussion below incorporates insights from ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ colleagues Christine Rein, Amber Swartzell, and Elizabeth Linville, who joined ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨â€™s August 12, 2026, webinar on how new program integrity expectations are affecting Medicaid payment, operations, and compliance strategies.
Jennifer Colamonico:ÌýWeÌýhear a lotÌýlatelyÌýabout heightened scrutiny and program integrity.ÌýWhat’sÌýfundamentally different about this moment from what MedicaidÌýleaders and their organizationsÌýhave experienced in the past?Ìý
Clint Eisenhower:ÌýThe biggest shift is that program integrity can no longer be viewed as a narrow compliance function.ÌýWhat weÌýareÌýseeing now is a move toward enterprise accountability—andÌýwe are really at theÌýoutset of this journey.ÌýProgram integrity touches finance, operations,Ìýeligibility, screening,Ìýcompliance, provider oversight, analytics, clinical teams, procurement, technology, and leadership decision-making. A provider issue can become a payment issue. A data gap can become an audit issue. A documentation weakness can become a compliance issue. The organizations that are best positioned are the ones that understand how those functions connect and canÌýdemonstrateÌýthat they are managing risk in a coordinated, evidence-based way.Ìý
From a leadership standpoint,ÌýleadersÌýofÌýMedicaidÌýorganizationsÌýca²Ô’tÌýsimply askÌýwhetherÌýthey have aÌýprogramÌýintegrity function.ÌýWe know—andÌýfederal and state regulators know—that most organizations do.ÌýInstead, leaders needÌýtoÌýaskÌýwhether that function is designed toÌýwithstand increasing scrutiny whileÌýitÌýalsoÌýhelpsÌýthe organization manage risk,ÌýsupportÌýstrongerÌýoperationalÌýperformance, andÌýcontinue toÌýserveÌýMedicaidÌýbeneficiaries effectively.Ìý
Q:ÌýMany organizations are trying to figure out whether this is just another enforcement cycle or something more significant. How are youÌýadvising clients toÌýthink about the current level of federal scrutiny?Ìý
Eisenhower: Every organization should be asking where its greatest vulnerabilities are—whether its controls, oversight processes, policies or operational capabilities may not be sufficient to address them. From there, leaders can prioritize what should be addressed now and what can be phased in.Ìý
We’veÌýworked with agencies and organizationsÌýfirst on theÌýobjective assessment ofÌýtheirÌýriskÌýandÌýmovedÌýtoÌýtranslateÌýtheÌýfindings into operational change, which may includeÌýdevelopingÌýroadmaps, updated workflows,ÌýandÌýstronger policies,Ìýamong other actions.Ìý
Q:ÌýThere’sÌýa lot of discussion about moving beyond the traditionalÌýpay-and-chaseÌýmodel, but whatÌýdoes aÌýprogramÌýintegrity-firstÌýapproach look like in practice?Ìý
Jennifer Bridgeforth:ÌýºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ is working with many state leaders and healthcare organizations that areÌýnavigating significant changes across Medicaid financing, eligibility and enrollment systems,ÌýandÌýprogram administration. At the same time, new federal policy and budget constraints are prompting many states to rethink how services are delivered, managed, and financed. Whether a state is redesigning benefits, implementing new eligibility processes, restructuring payment approaches, or pursuing broader delivery system reforms, program integrity considerations need to be embedded into those decisions from day one.Ìý
ThatÌýincludesÌýdocumentation requirements,ÌýmonitoringÌýprotocols,Ìýdata validation,Ìýand accountability structuresÌýbuiltÌýinto theÌýprogramÌýdesign.Ìý
It also means aligning oversight efforts with emerging federal and state priorities. We are seeing increased attention on areas such as nonemergency medical transportation, applied behavior analysis,Ìýpersonal care services, durable medical equipment, andÌýbehavioral health services,Ìýas well as techniques such asÌýevaluation and management coding, andÌýidentifyingÌýhigh-volume billing patterns.ÌýMedicaid leaders need toÌýdesign programs and workflows thatÌýidentifyÌýrisks earlier, supportÌýappropriate accessÌýto care, and create feedback loops that strengthen operations over time, reducing reliance on a traditionalÌýpay-and-chaseÌýapproach.Ìý
Q:ÌýOne challenge we hear aboutÌýfrequentlyÌýis how to strengthen oversight without creating barriers to care. How can organizations strike that balance, particularly in areas like behavioral health andÌýappliedÌýbehaviorÌýanalysis (ABA),Ìýwhere access is already strained?Ìý
Bridgeforth:ÌýThat balance is critical. Many of the areas under scrutiny are alsoÌýin whichÌýthere is tremendous demand and, in some markets,Ìýa shortage ofÌýproviders. ABA and behavioral health are good examples. The answer cannot beÌýto discourage appropriateÌýaccess. Instead, organizations need stronger documentation, clearer policies, better training, and a shared understanding of what compliant billing and service delivery look like.Ìý
Provider education is one of the most important tools. When providers are asked to document more or differently, it can feel like administrative burden. Education has to explain not only what the requirements are, but why they matter.Ìý
Eisenhower:ÌýHealth plans and providersÌýhaveÌýa strategic opportunity here.ÌýStates still need partners to help achieve access goals and improve outcomes. Plans, providers, and vendors that canÌýdemonstrateÌýstrong program integrity policiesÌýand effective oversight can position themselves as trusted partners. They help states pursue access and quality goals with greater confidence that those initiatives will not create unnecessary compliance exposure.Ìý
Q:ÌýOrganizations are investing heavily in analytics and AI capabilities.ÌýWhere do you see the greatest opportunity for these tools to strengthen program integrity efforts?Ìý
Bridgeforth:ÌýAdvanced analytics and AI are becoming increasingly important for detection and prevention. Real-time monitoring, claims pattern analysis, and predictive tools can help organizationsÌýidentifyÌýrisk earlier andÌýtake actionÌýbefore issues become larger findings or recoveries. But technology isÌývaluableÌýonlyÌýif the organization has the governance, workflows, documentation, and case management processes to act onÌýthe data thatÌýthe toolsÌýidentify.Ìý
Cross-program compliance is also important. Many organizationsÌýoperateÌýacross Medicaid, Medicare, Marketplace, commercial, and other public programs. When program integrity is approached at the enterprise level, improvements in one area can strengthen compliance across multiple product lines or programs.Ìý
Q:ÌýYou’veÌýworked with states and healthcare organizations atÌývery differentÌýstages of maturity. What are some of the most common gaps or challengesÌýyou’reÌýhelping clients address today?Ìý
Bridgeforth:ÌýWe’veÌýworked with organizations atÌývery differentÌýstages of maturity.ÌýFor example,ÌýweÌýsupported an organizational assessment and gap analysis that helped a clientÌýidentifyÌýmajor opportunities across its program integrity function. The team developed a roadmap organized across sevenÌýFWAÌýpillars,ÌýidentifiedÌý52 enhancement opportunities, translated those into 184 key actions, and developed 116 success measures so leadership couldÌýmonitorÌýprogress over time.Ìý
ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ and HealthTech Solutions, an ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ Company,Ìýalso supported a statewide implementation that included electronic visit verification improvements, prepayment analytics, post-payment analytics, and modernization of claims review processes. The effortÌýtheÌýstateÌýmoveÌýfrom manual, reactive processes toward a more proactive model, with insights from post-payment analytics informing prepayment edits that could be updated in weeks rather than months.Ìý
Q:ÌýIfÌýyou’reÌýa MedicaidÌýleaderÌýlooking ahead to the next 12 toÌý24 months, what should be at the top of yourÌýprogramÌýintegrity agenda?Ìý
Eisenhower:ÌýMany of the steps that reduce program integrity risk are the same steps that help organizations perform better: stronger governance, better data, clearer accountability, more consistent workflows, improved provider relationships, and effective monitoring.ÌýThe upside is not only avoiding findings or reducing audit exposure. It is alsoÌýensuringÌýMedicaid dollars are directed to theÌýright beneficiaries, theÌýright services, the right providers, and the right outcomes.Ìý
How ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ Can HelpÌý
ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ helps states, health plans, providers, and healthcare organizations assess program integrity risk, strengthen governance and compliance infrastructure, design and implement payment integrity strategies, support provider education, modernize analytics and monitoring, and translate findings into measurable operational improvements. ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ can meet organizations where they are, whether they need a targeted assessment, a phased roadmap, implementation support,Ìýdata analytics support,Ìýor enterprise-wideÌýprogramÌýintegrity transformation.Ìý
For more information, go to:Ìý/services/our-medicaid-consultants-help-you-develop-innovative-strategies/.Ìý
Federal Policy News
Fueled By Weekly Health Intelligence
FDA Unveils Its Vision for PDUFA VIII
Last week, FDAÌýÌýthe proposed Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) VIIIÌý.ÌýThe PDUFA program allows FDA to collect fees from drug sponsors and manufacturers when they submit new or supplemental applications to market drugs. The PDUFA user fees are collected primarily to support the work of the review teams within FDA’s drugs and biologics centers and other teams at FDA specific to the review and regulation of drugs. In exchange for industry’s commitments to pay user fees, FDA agrees to meet certain performance goals in terms of meetings, guidances, and application review timelines. These are not application specific, but rather performance goals applied to the drug program as a whole. The Commitment Letter outlines the proposed revisions for the implementation of PDUFA after the current program term expires on September 30, 2027. The provisions outlined in this Letter would apply for FY 2028 and run through FY 2032. 
FDA’s overall goals for PDUFA VIII as detailed in the Commitment Letter focus on streamlining consistency and expediting review processes to increase timely access to safe and effective drugs in the U.S. The Commitment Letter maintains review performance goals under PDUFA VII, transitions some pilots to programs, and introduces new enhancements. Notably, the Commitment Letter: 
- Maintains core review performance goals at the PDUFA VII levels for submissions, resubmissions, manufacturing supplements, and extensions.Ìý
- Offers enhancement to meeting management to increaseÌýefficiencies, offers several new meeting opportunities, and adds a new process for sponsors to provide a “specific rationale†for face-to-face meetings. Ìý
- Commits to aÌýthird partyÌýassessment of the quality and efficiency of drug development and review programs at FDA, followed by a public workshop and final report.Ìý
- Commits to advancing development of drugs for rare diseases through: Ìý
- The continuation of CDER Rare Disease Staff and CBER Rare Disease Program Staff; Ìý
- Transitioning the Rare Disease Endpoint Advancement from a pilot to a program and increases the maximum number of programs to six by FY 2029; Ìý
- Holding three public workshops on endpoint development; and Ìý
- Holding up to 10 RISE workshops, with at least one per year.Ìý
- Formally recognizes restructuring of center-specific support staff into the shared services operations overseen by the Office of the Commissioner. Ìý
- Provides a new and improved engagement mechanism on chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) with enhanced communications, publishing guidance, and offering a pre-submission meeting, as well as a post-action meeting for CMC deficiencies. Ìý
- Continues previous PDUFA activities, including enhancing benefit-risk assessments, use of and staff capacity for complex innovative trial designs, supporting use of digital health technologies and partnership with CDRH’s Digital Health Center of Excellence, use of and annual report on RWE in submissions, biomarkers drug development qualification tools, Patient-Focused Drug Development efforts, including publishing case studies and hosting a workshop, REMS modernization efforts, and optimization of Sentinel, including transitioning to Sentinel 3.0. Ìý
FDA also commits to training staff on regulatory science tools andÌýcommunicating aboutÌýits use of the tools.
Several provisions that were anticipated or have historically been included in commitment letters were not included in the PDUFA VIII Commitment Letter, including:
- “America first†provisions such as a 50 percent reduction in the application fee for U.S. anchored phase 1 trial data and small business waivers for domestic companies, and a 50 percent application fee for the first non-orphan indication supplement if the original application received an orphan application fee exception. However, these items are expected to be included in the legislative language that FDA transmits to Congress.Ìý
- Specific hiring goals. FDA staffing levels haveÌýremainedÌýa focus, particularly given significant numbers of CBER and CDER staff left the agency sinceÌý2025Ìýand FDA did not meet its PDUFA VII hiring goals in FY 2025.Ìý
- Specific mention of the Rare Disease Innovation Hub, although the Rare Disease Innovation, Science, and Exploration (RISE) workshops are mentioned.Ìý
- Specific commitments on activities related to the Cell and Gene Therapy Program, unlike in PDUFA VII, when there wereÌýa number ofÌýspecific commitments related to public workshops, trainings, andÌýguidances.Ìý
- Minimal commitment to hold workshops/meetings or issue specificÌýguidancesÌýin contrast to past PDUFA Commitment Letters.Ìý
A hybrid publicÌýÌýwill be held on September 16 at FDA’s White Oak Campus in Silver Spring, Maryland, to discuss the proposed enhancements for the reauthorization of PDUFA for FYs 2028–2032.ÌýÌý(docket FDA-2026-N-8163) must beÌýsubmittedÌýby October 16.Ìý
HHS Opens Nominations for National Vaccine Advisory Committee
ÌýOn August 12, HHSÌýÌýa Federal Register noticeÌýsolicitingÌýnominations for appointments to theÌý. The NVAC is a federal advisory committee that provides guidance and recommendations to the HHS Secretary on vaccine policy, including vaccine safety, supply, and research priorities. Recently, NVAC’sÌýwas renewed andÌýmodifiedÌýsuch that the committee would also review dietary supplements intended to prevent infectious disease and strategies to protect individuals who decline vaccination while limiting disease transmission. Unlike FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (), whichÌýadvisesÌýFDA on vaccine regulatory policy and approval recommendations, and CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (), which makes recommendations to CDC on vaccine use and coverage, NVAC provides broader policy and strategic recommendations to HHS. Although advisory committee recommendations are often influential, they are not binding. The NVAC, which typically meets three times per year, has not held a meeting since 2024. The notice states that membership will be “balanced and include individuals engaged in vaccine safety or efficacy research, physicians, scientists, members of parent organizations concerned with immunizations, and representatives of state or local health agencies and public health organizations.†Members may serve overlapping terms of up to four years. Nominations must be emailed toÌý[email protected]Ìýby September 11.
New HHS Funding Aims to Expand Rapid Syphilis Testing and Treatment
On August 12, HHSÌýÌýa $4 million initiative to expand rapid syphilis testing and treatment for mothers and babies, with a focus on women in emergency departments and nontraditional healthcare settings. The funding will be used to expand access to rapid, point-of-care syphilis testing, enablingÌýearly treatmentÌýintervention. HHS will direct $3.25 million to CDC’s Division of Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention to provide supplemental awards to recipients of CDC’sÌýÌýcooperative agreement in areas with a high burden of syphilis and congenital syphilis. Cooperative agreement supplemental awards will be used for point-of-care syphilis testing and linkages to care, and remaining funds will be used to support national partners providing technicalÌýassistanceÌýand implementation support.
Administration Introduces "Treatment First" Approach to Homelessness
On August 12, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., ONDCP Director Sara Carter, and HUD Secretary Scott Turner announced the release of theÌý: Addressing Homelessness and Addiction Through “Treatment First.†Developed by SAMHSA following a White House Ìýon homelessness and addiction, the toolkit promotes a “Treatment First†approach that prioritizes evidence-based substance use and mental health treatment, recovery supports, employment, and self-sufficiency as the foundation for addressing homelessness. The toolkit presents this model as an alternative to traditional “Housing First†approaches, arguing that treatment and recovery services should be more centrally integrated into homelessness response efforts. It emphasizes that communities should focus on long-term recovery outcomes, including abstinence from drugs, improved mental health, stable housing, employment, and reintegration into families and communities. The toolkit also highlights coordinated care, accountability, peer recovery supports, faith-based partnerships, and stronger connections among treatment providers, housing programs, public safety agencies, and community organizations. Additionally, on August 12, President Trump issued a proclamationÌýdesignatingÌýAugust 2026 as National Substance Use Primary Prevention Month. TheÌýÌýidentifiesÌýprevention as a key pillar of the Administratio²Ô’s 2026 National Drug Control Strategy and calls on families, schools, faith organizations, and communities to help prevent substance use before it begins, particularly among youth.
Ready to talk about your organization's challenges?
Schedule a ConsultationState Policy News
Colorado Releases Medicaid Frailty Work Requirement Exemptions RFI
The Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and FinancingÌýÌýon August 6, 2026, a request for information (RFI)ÌýregardingÌýmedical frailty exemption determinations related to the Medicaid work requirements approved under the federal 2025 budget reconciliation act (P.L 119-21, OBBBA). HCPF is using the RFI to conduct research onÌýcapabilitiesÌýof organizations that could potentially provide medical frailty determination services toÌýdetermineÌýindividuals who would be exempt from Medicaid work requirements. The RFI welcomes recommendationsÌýregardingÌýbest practices, operational models, approaches to staffing, reporting capabilities, technology solutions, and other considerations. Responses are due August 20, 2026.Ìý
Idaho Issues RFI Exploring Public Benefit Fraud Prevention
The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare  on August 14, 2026, a request for information (RFI)ÌýregardingÌýways it could strengthen the prevention of fraud, waste, and abuse in public benefit programs. The department seeks feedback on advanced data analytics, data mining, artificial intelligence, pattern and anomaly detection, and other technology that could help it prioritize cases to review, as it currently relies heavily on complaints, tips, and staff-initiated fraud referrals. DHW is exploring a combination of humanÌýexpertiseÌýand technology to develop cases and route high-priority cases to relevant investigators. Idaho will accept comments through August 31, 2026.
Maryland Issues RFI on Expanding Nutrition Services for Medicaid Members in 2028
The Maryland Department of Health  on August 19, 2026, a request for information (RFI) on proposed food and nutrition services for Medicaid membersÌýthoughÌýan In Lieu of Services and Settings (ILOS) authority in 2028. The proposal builds on Maryland’s existingÌýinitiativeÌýFood Is Medicine, including Medically Tailored Meals, whichÌýoperatesÌýin six counties. Maryland will also launch the Produce Prescription program later this summer. The Department willÌýdraw onÌýlessons from these programs, as well as the Rural Health Transformation Program, to inform the Medicaid ILOS approach. RFI Responses are due October 14.Ìý
Nebraska Medicaid Director Resigns; State Receives Federal Approval for SUD Section 1115 Demonstration Amendment
Nebraska Governor Jim Pillen  on August 13, 2026, that Drew GonshorowskiÌýhas resignedÌýfrom his position at the Department of Health and Human Services as the director of the Division of Medicaid and Long-Term Care. Governor Pillen has appointed Jeremy Brunssen,ÌýtheÌýdivisio²Ô’s Deputy Director of Finance and Program Integrity, as interim director.ÌýSeparately,Ìýthe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services  on August 14, 2026, that it hasÌýapproved an amendment for Nebraska’s Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Program Section 1115 Demonstration. The amendment allows the state toÌýestablishÌýa demonstration initiative for serious mental illness/serious emotional disturbance. Nebraska will be able to administer services to Medicaid-coveredÌýshort-termÌýresidents in facilities that meet the definition of an institution for mental diseases. The demonstration is effective through June 30, 2030.Ìý
Oregon CCOs Earn Net Operating Profit of $67 Million in 2025
The Oregon Health Authority (OHA)  on August 12, 2026, that the 16 Oregon Medicaid coordinated care organizations (CCOs) earned a net operating profit of $67 million and an operating margin of 0.8 percent in 2025, according to an analysis by the department. Individual CCO operating margins varied from 5.4 percent to -3.4 percent and were collectively lower than historical averages. Four of the CCOs had a net loss. CCOs collectively spent 9 percent more in 2025 to cover services for their Medicaid members in comparison to the year before. Approximately 1.4 million Medicaid members are served by CCOs. To develop 2027 capitation rates, OHA is factoring in 2025 financial performance as well as available financial and claims data for 2026. OHA willÌýfinalizeÌý2027 capitation rates by the end of this year.Ìý
Private Market News
Fueled By
Week In Washington | August 13, 2026
Federal healthcare policy saw a notable legal setback as an appeals court struck down HHS’sÌýmethodologyÌýfor calculating No Surprises Act payment benchmarks, potentially delaying dispute resolution between providers and insurers. At the same time, employers continue moving away from the nation’s largest pharmacy benefit managers, signaling ongoing shifts in the pharmacy benefits market. Hospitals are also preparing for higher medical device costs as tariff pressures mount, with the administration expected to decide soon onÌýadditionalÌýimport duties. Meanwhile, Congress has recessed until after Labor Day, with major legislative activity likely to remain limited until later this year.
Our Insights
Fueled By Experts Across Our ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ Companies
ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨
Advancing Community Health Through CHWs: Research, Recommendations, and Action (Aug. 26)
Community Health Workers (CHWs) play a critical role in connecting communities to trusted health information, services, and resources. This webinar will share ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ (ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨) will present key findings from an assessment conducted by ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨, with support from Michael Reese Health Trust and Community Memorial Foundation, that examined examines how health-related information reaches, is interpreted by, and flows through CHWs Community Health Workers in Cook County, Illinois. Participants will also learn about ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨’s key findings and recommendations for strengthening health information systems, elevating the value of the CHW workforce, and advancing partnerships that support equitable, community-centered care. The session will further highlight opportunities for state agencies, funders, health systems, CHW employers, and community organizations to translate these findings into policy, funding, and practice.Ìý
Webinar Replay: Rural Health Transformation Program: Beyond the Grant Approval Phase – Implementing for Sustainability
ÌýThisÌýwebinarÌýwent beyond the grant planning processes and exploredÌýhow an effective RHTP implementation process can support measurable improvements in population health, enhance financial viability for rural hospitals and healthcare organizations, and foster stronger systems of care across our rural communities.
Webinar Replay – Summer Webinar Series: How New Program Integrity Expectations Affect Medicaid Payments
°Õ³ó¾±²õ webinar contextualized solutions for healthcare leaders to enhance their approach to program integrity and fraud, waste, and abuse. ºìÁì½í¹Ï±¨ consultants delivered analysis and actionable insights on the evolving policy and operational environment.Ìý
Wakely
Potential CMS ACA Marketplace Disenrollments: Implications for Health Insurers
A recent US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reportÌýindicatesÌýthat the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) isÌýtaking action to identifyÌýand remove potentially unauthorized Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace enrollments. These actions could have significant implications for individual ACA market issuers, including changes in morbidity, risk adjustment transfers, financial reporting, administrative costs, and future pricing.
RFP Calendar
RFP Calendar
| Date | State/Program | Event | Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date: Summer 2026 | State/Program: Illinois Foster Care | Event: RFP Release | Beneficiaries: 33,000 |
| Date: July 28, 2026 (Delayed) | State/Program: Nevada Children's Specialty | Event: Awards | Beneficiaries: NA |
| Date: August 2026 | State/Program: Indiana | Event: RFP Release | Beneficiaries: 1,400,000 |
| Date: January 1, 2027 | State/Program: Illinois | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: 2,400,000 |
| Date: January 1, 2027 | State/Program: Nevada CO D-SNP | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: 88,000 |
| Date: January 1, 2027 | State/Program: Wisconsin LTC GSR 3 | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: 56,000 (all GSR) |
| Date: January 1, 2027 | State/Program: Illinois Tailored Care Management Program | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: 22,400 |
| Date: July 1, 2027 | State/Program: Nevada Children's Specialty | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: NA |
| Date: September 2, 2026 | State/Program: Missouri | Event: Proposals Due | Beneficiaries: 1,000,000 |
| Date: Fall 2027 | State/Program: Oregon | Event: RFP Release | Beneficiaries: 1,200,000 |
| Date: January 1, 2028 | State/Program: Wisconsin LTC GSR 4,6 | Event: Implementation | Beneficiaries: 56,000 (all GSR) |
| Date: 2028 | State/Program: North Carolina | Event: RFP Release | Beneficiaries: 2,200,000 |
| Date: 2029 | State/Program: California | Event: RFP Release | Beneficiaries: NA |