红领巾瓜报

Insights

红领巾瓜报 Insights: Your source for healthcare news, ideas and analysis.

红领巾瓜报 Insights 鈥 including our new podcast 鈥 puts the vast depth of 红领巾瓜报鈥檚 expertise at your fingertips, helping you stay informed about the latest healthcare trends and topics. Below, you can easily search based on your topic of interest to find useful information from our podcast, blogs, webinars, case studies, reports and more.

Show All | Podcast | Blogs | Webinars | Weekly Roundup | Videos | Case Studies | Reports | News | Spotlight

Filter by topic:

Receive timely expert insights on topics you care about.

Select Topics

24 Results found.

Blog

ACA Marketplaces at a Crossroads: New Analysis Compares Out-of-Pocket by Major Payers

Read Blog

As we approach the end of 2025, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplaces face a pivotal moment. Enhanced Advance Premium Tax Credits (APTCs), introduced under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and extended through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), have driven enrollment to 24 million individuals now covered through the Marketplaces. Without congressional action, these subsidies expire on December 31, 2025.

红领巾瓜报 and Wakely, an 红领巾瓜报 Company, have released updated analysis that compares enrollee out-of-pocket spending of ACA marketplace enrollees to other major payers using claims data.  The brief answers key questions about Marketplace enrollees and whether they spend more or less out-of-pocket relative to Medicare, ESI and Medicaid enrollees.

Click here to view the white paper.

Brief & Report

Updated Analysis Compares Consumer Out-of-Pocket Spending of ACA Marketplace Enrollees to other Major Payers Using Claims Data

Download

红领巾瓜报 and Wakely, an 红领巾瓜报 Company, have released an updated Issue Brief to the comprehensive profile of ACA Marketplace enrollees that was based on claims data from nearly 6 million of the 24 million Marketplace enrollees.

The issue brief discusses these key questions:

  1. Do Marketplace enrollees spend more or less out-of-pocket relative to Medicare, ESI and Medicaid enrollees?
  2. How may the potential expiration of eAPTCs impact out-of-pocket costs?
  3. What are some initial considerations regarding overall healthcare affordability?

Please fill out this form to receive a copy of the update and issue brief.

Contact any of the report authors with further questions, or to discuss potential applications of this work for your organization.

Blog

Preparing for Change: Strategies for States and Issuers Amid 2026 Marketplace Shifts

Read Blog

The upcoming 2026 open enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces is likely to be one of the most complex since the program鈥檚 implementation. Recent federal policy changes, ongoing litigation, and uncertainty around the extension of enhanced premium tax credits (ePTCs) are converging to create significant challenges for federal and state regulators, policymakers, and issuers. Rising premiums, expiring subsidies, and shifting federal regulations also have created an environment of significant uncertainty for consumers, navigators, and brokers.

A new report, Complexity for the 2026 Marketplace Open Enrollment: Risks of Consumer Confusion & Coverage Loss, authored by 红领巾瓜报 (红领巾瓜报) and Wakely, an 红领巾瓜报 Company, with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, explains these changes and their collective effect on costs and consumer experiences.

In this article, 红领巾瓜报 and Wakely experts preview the options policymakers, states, regulators, issuers, consumer advocates, enrollment assisters, and other stakeholders can implement to mitigate potential confusion and coverage losses.

Federal Policy Shifts Driving Complexity

Central to the current challenges is the scheduled expiration of ePTCs at the end of 2025. Without congressional action, the 鈥渟ubsidy cliff鈥 returns, eliminating subsidies for consumers with incomes above 400 percent of the federal poverty level and reducing assistance for those living below. Early filings suggest average premium increases of 20 percent, which could be untenable for millions of families and small business owners enrolling in individual market coverage.

Additional federal changes compound the challenge:

  • The 2025 Budget Reconciliation Act (OBBBA)听removes advance premium tax credit (APTC) eligibility for certain lawfully present immigrant populations and eliminates Internal Revenue Service repayment caps on excess APTCs, including financial risk for consumers.
  • 罢丑别听聽changed eligibility and enrollment requirements. Some provisions are paused due to ongoing litigation (听补苍诲听), creating implementation uncertainty.
  • CMS updated issuer renewal and discontinuation notice聽, allowing issuers to omit premium and APTC information from their 2026 renewal notices, reducing clarity for consumers comparing plans.
  • 聽to catastrophic plan policy聽broadens eligibility but may create confusion when comparing options.

These changes are occurring alongside notable issuer exits, affecting millions of enrollees. States and issuers must be prepared to manage plan mapping and consumer transitions, potentially involving different networks and benefits.

Emergent Conditions for Open Enrollment Season

The combined impact of these changes is likely to increase marketplace call center traffic, broker and navigator assistance requests, eligibility appeals, and special enrollment activity, all of which will strain system capacity. Vulnerable populations, including those with limited English proficiency and those living in non-expansion states, face heightened risks of disenrollment. Operational strain is expected across marketplaces, issuers, and enrollment assistance networks.

Enrollment losses and affordability challenges also will be more significant in states that have not expanded Medicaid, particularly for lower income and older enrollees. The ACA Marketplaces experienced an influx of new enrollees as a result of ePTC, leading to historical enrollment growth in these states. On average, non-expansion states have seen their ACA Marketplaces grow by 152 percent from 2020 to 2024 versus 47 percent average growth in expansion states.

Regulators and issuers also must navigate the legal uncertainty surrounding the  and OBBBA provisions. With litigation ongoing, some rules may change mid-enrollment, requiring flexible implementation and communication strategies.

Strategies to Navigate the Current Complexity

To address these challenges, stakeholders can take several steps, including:

  • Clear, Consistent Messaging.聽Consumers will need clear communications advising them to review and update their plan selections. Communications should be direct, succinct, culturally appropriate, multilingual, and delivered repeatedly and through multiple channels.
  • Strengthened Noticing. It will be critical that federal, state, and issuer notifications to consumers be aligned, when possible. Notices should clearly explain premium and eligibility changes for affected populations and the actions they need to take.
  • Expanded Outreach. Enrollment assistance and direct to consumer education are critical, especially for low-income consumers, immigrants, and those previously auto enrolled. Partnerships with brokers, assisters, and community organizations will be key to reaching difficult-to-engage populations.
  • Enhanced Capacity. Investments in call center staffing, assister funding, and broker training can help address increased volume of consumer inquiries. Marketplace and issuer call centers should leverage available data to enhance their ability to serve affected consumers. States may consider adjusting compensation models to reflect the increased complexity.
  • Policy Flexibility. Federal and state marketplaces should prepare to use operational flexibility to mitigate coverage losses. If ePTCs are extended during or after open enrollment, special enrollment periods or extended deadlines may be needed. Retroactive coverage and grace period extensions could also address gaps.

Looking Ahead

The 2026 open enrollment period will test the resilience of the ACA infrastructure. For regulators, states, and issuers, the priority must be clarity, retention, and stability. Monitoring enrollment trends, premium differentials, and consumer confusion will be essential for adapting strategies and maintaining market viability.

Without coordinated communication and outreach, coverage losses and poor plan choices could undermine individual financial protection and destabilize the broader individual market. Lessons from previous enrollment periods and Medicaid鈥檚 COVID-19 public health emergency unwinding can guide efforts to keep consumers informed and enrolled.

Connect with Us

红领巾瓜报 and Wakely experts are closely tracking federal policy activity and state actions to address these challenges. Our experts support states, managed care organizations, consumer groups, and other interest holders to achieve success in the operation of and participation in the marketplaces. Our team has broad historical knowledge of the challenges and opportunities in this market and can support every step of the planning and execution processes to optimize markets as they continue to evolve in the coming months and years. If you have questions or want to discuss the recommendations included in the report, contact聽our experts below.

Brief & Report

Complexity for the 2026 Marketplace Open Enrollment: Risks of Consumer Confusion & Coverage Loss

Download

The upcoming 2026 open enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces is likely to be one of the most complex since the program鈥檚 implementation. Recent federal policy changes, ongoing litigation, and uncertainty around the extension of enhanced premium tax credits (ePTCs) are converging to create significant challenges for federal and state regulators, policymakers, and issuers. Rising premiums, expiring subsidies, and shifting federal regulations also have created an environment of significant uncertainty for consumers, navigators and brokers.

In this report, Complexity for the 2026 Marketplace Open Enrollment: Risks of Consumer Confusion & Coverage Loss, authored by 红领巾瓜报 (红领巾瓜报) and Wakely, an 红领巾瓜报 Company, with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, explains these changes and their collective effect on costs and consumer experiences.

红领巾瓜报 and Wakely experts preview the analysis and the options policymakers, states, regulators, issuers, consumer advocates, and enrollment assisters, and other stakeholders can plan for to mitigate this confusion and coverage losses.

Blog

ACA Marketplaces at a Crossroads: New Data Reveals Who鈥檚 Covered and What鈥檚 at Stake

Read Blog

As we approach the end of 2025, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplaces face a pivotal moment. Enhanced Advance Premium Tax Credits (APTCs), introduced under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and extended through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), have driven record-breaking enrollment, with 24 million individuals now covered through the Marketplaces. Without congressional action, these subsidies will expire on December 31, 2025.

This pending policy shift makes it more urgent than ever to understand who the Marketplace serves, what enrollees receive, and how future changes could affect affordability and access.

红领巾瓜报 and Wakely, an 红领巾瓜报 Company, have released a new Issue Brief that provides a comprehensive profile of Affordable Care Act Marketplace enrollees primarily based on claims data from nearly 6 million of the 24 million Marketplace enrollees. The brief answers key questions about Marketplace enrollees, including the types of health conditions they have and the types of services and prescription drugs they use.

The white paper is available on the 红领巾瓜报 website.

Blog

Big changes ahead for ACA marketplace plan enrollment and premiums

Read Blog

With changes to ACA subsidies included in H.R. 1, the healthcare industry could face the biggest change since the passage of the ACA.

Health insurance coverage is likely to be disrupted by changes in ACA marketplace financing, particularly due to the projected reductions in ACA subsidies, as well as the impacts of eligibility and enrollment changes in Medicaid. At a recent 红领巾瓜报 webinar, our ACA marketplace experts detailed a number of challenges that health plans participating in the ACA will face in the coming months and years due to these new policies, and some of the thinking behind ways that plans can take action now while Congress debates whether to extend any of the subsidies. 

The webinar touched on areas including:

  • How the recent policy and funding changes will affect strategic planning, longer term goals, and 2027 plan year rate setting;
  • Actuarial analysis/rate setting/risk adjustment insights from 红领巾瓜报鈥檚 actuaries;
  • Changes likely to occur in plan and marketplace operations in both state exchanges and on the healthcare.gov federal platform;
  • The importance of effective communications to avoid creating consumer confusion, and ideas on stakeholder engagement strategies;
  • And, how all of this will impact workforce/access to care, and the likelihood of changes to in-network care

The ACA marketplace is bracing for impacts for the 2026 plan year, depending upon potential Congressional actions in the remaining months of 2025.  In May 2025, CMS put out a rate filing bulletin for plan year 2026 that gave technical directions for submissions and urging states and issuers to be prepared to react to Congressional action. This was a signal that the administration anticipated potential policy changes between May when they put this out and the rate filing window in the fall.

This is reminiscent of the ACA changes that happened in 2017, when there was litigation around cost-sharing reduction (CSR) subsidies that needed to be appropriated. (This was during the 鈥渞epeal and replace鈥 debate in Congress, in that same July-August timeframe.) When repeal efforts failed in Congress, the Administration decided not to pay CSRs, necessitating a bipartisan agreement to address this new financing issue.  Changes to CSRs were dropped from this year鈥檚 law but could be addressed before the end of the year in upcoming appropriations bills in Congress.

鈥淎CA plan strategies need to change to ensure that they are considering different outcomes in the market composition and competitor changes to pricing strategies. Expect more policy changes and potential for market churn, making pricing difficult in 2027 given the limited information on what happens in 2026.鈥Michelle Anderson

A recent Wakely report analyzing the early draft of HR 1 before passage () details estimated reductions in the individual market enrollment with potential reduction anywhere from 47 to 57% or 11.2 to 13.6 million enrollment enrollees by 2028. The attrition estimates include the loss of both federally subsidized individuals, as well as the unsubsidized due to premium increases. This paper was quoted in a recent NY Times piece,

鈥淐hanges are coming for Healthcare.gov and state marketplace consumers in 2026. The (likely) expiring enhanced premium tax credits, as well as provisions within HR 1 and the Marketplace Integrity and Affordability rule will all be rolled out to marketplace consumers this coming Open Enrollment. In addition to the marketplaces, state departments of insurance, issuers, enrollment assistance professionals, and other stakeholders will play a critical role in helping consumers navigate the coming eligibility and affordability changes.鈥 – Zach Sherman

Impacted marketplace consumers need to be made aware of these coming changes. States and issuers should undertake a broad, aggressive, and coordinated communication effort around the overall rate changes. Ensuring consumers understand how their net premium is changing due to expiring enhanced premium tax credits as well as the other operational changes will be crucial to their ability to stay covered. We expect to see considerable consumer plan switching this coming open enrollment as a result. Some consumers may need to buy-down to silver or bronze plans to be able to afford to maintain their coverage. Marketplaces will need to ramp up customer service and navigation support. States with reinsurance programs or premium subsidies should consider ramping up funding to mitigate the affordability gaps that are likely to occur.

鈥淚t’s really important for folks in the ACA marketplace community to be active when it comes to policymaking and advocacy.鈥&苍产蝉辫; 鈥 Liz Wroe

These issues are part of the government funding debates underway right now as a government shutdown looms. Depending upon the outcome with the September funding deadline, or the possibility of a supplemental funding bill this year, these ACA marketplace issues could be addressed in several sets of negotiations.  Now is the time to talk to your state officials, insurance commissioners, associations and contacts in the Federal government to ensure they have a good understanding of how these ACA marketplace changes will impact coverage in your state.

To hear the full discussion, you can find the replay and materials for the ACA webinar here, and download the full Wakely paper at .

Blog

Navigating the Post-Subsidy Cliff – Mitigating Premium Increases After Enhanced ACA Subsidies Expire

Read Blog

As the end of 2025 approaches, the future of enhanced premium subsidies for Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace coverage remains uncertain. These subsidies, extended by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), are set to expire December 31, 2025. Without congressional action, millions of Americans will face a sudden and significant increase in out-of-pocket premium costs, reintroducing the 鈥渟ubsidy cliff鈥 and raising the percentage of income that they will need to direct toward health insurance premiums. More than 16 million consumers who now receive subsidies will be affected, making this a critical issue for policymakers, payers, and consumers.

A new  from Wakely, an 红领巾瓜报 Company, offers a timely and detailed analysis of the potential impacts and strategic considerations for stakeholders navigating this uncertain terrain.

How ACA Subsidies Are Calculated: The Mechanics Behind Premiums

The white paper explains that advance premium tax credits (APTCs) are designed to cap a household鈥檚 health insurance premium contribution at a specific percentage of income. The calculation is based on household income, size, the cost of the benchmark Second Lowest Cost Silver Plan (SLCSP), and age. The expiration of enhanced subsidies will revert contribution percentages to higher levels, increasing costs for all income brackets.

Premium Shock: Quantifying the Impact of Subsidy Expiration

Wakely鈥檚 analysis shows that the expiration of enhanced subsidies will result in a substantial increase in monthly premium contributions. For example, a hypothetical single 40-year-old at 150 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) will see monthly premiums jump from $0 to $81.97 in order to keep the same plan.

Mitigation Strategy: Buying Down to the Lowest Cost Silver Plan

Consumers may offset part of the premium increase by switching from the SLCSP to the Lowest Cost Silver Plan (LCSP). The difference in premiums between these two plans translates directly into monthly savings, independent of income. In Raleigh, NC, a hypothetical 40-year-old could save $53.03 per month by buying down, mitigating about two-thirds of the premium shock. For older consumers, the savings are even greater; however, in highly competitive markets like Charlotte, NC, the premium gap鈥攁nd the savings鈥攚ill be much smaller, offsetting only a modest portion of the increase.

Consumer Savings

After applying the buy-down strategy, the net premium increase for a hypothetical single 40-year-old at 150 percent of the FPL in Raleigh will be $28.94 per month rather than $81.97 without mitigation. Depending on age and location, consumers can offset 37鈥100 percent of the premium increase in less competitive markets, but only 7鈥28 percent in highly competitive ones.

Market Dynamics: Why Local Competition Matters

The effectiveness of mitigation strategies depends on local market dynamics and competition. In markets with fewer carriers and larger premium gaps, consumers have greater opportunities to offset premium increases. In competitive markets, options are more limited. The paper notes that the 2026 landscape may shift due to carrier exits and price changes, underscoring the need for ongoing monitoring and adaptive strategies.

Recommendations for Payers, Regulators, and Brokers

  • Payers聽should consider product design strategies that create meaningful premium gaps between Silver plans, where actuarially justified, to maximize consumer savings.
  • Regulators聽can collaborate with insurers to support these strategies and, in state-based Marketplaces, may play an active role in limiting Silver offerings that erode premium gaps.
  • Brokers and Carriers聽may want to market Bronze plans as a last-resort coverage option, as some consumers can access Bronze plans for free, which is preferable to going uninsured.

 Connect with Us

Wakely is experienced in all facets of the healthcare industry鈥攆rom carriers to providers to government agencies. Wakely actuarial and policy experts continually monitor and analyze potential changes to inform healthcare organization strategies and advance effective solutions to propel their success.

For questions about this analysis or to discuss strategies for navigating the post-subsidy cliff, contact聽our expert below.

Podcasts

Is the ACA Marketplace Built to Survive Another Decade of Change?

Listen Now

Michelle Anderson, director and senior consulting actuary at Wakely, an 红领巾瓜报 Company, joins Vital Viewpoints on Healthcare to unpack the state of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace. From the market鈥檚 volatile beginnings to today鈥檚 uncertainty around subsidies, Michelle shares how insurers, states, and consumers have adapted and what challenges lie ahead. We explore the forces shaping affordability, coverage options, and consumer behavior, as well as the critical policy decisions that could redefine the individual market in 2026 and beyond.

Blog

H.R. 1 Signed Into Law鈥擶hat It Means for Medicaid and Public Coverage

Read Blog

Just one week after we reviewed the Senate鈥檚 version of the budget reconciliation bill, H.R. 1, President Trump has now signed the legislation into law. The final iteration of H.R. 1 includes sweeping changes to Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplaces, and Medicare鈥攕everal of which diverge significantly from the version that the House passed May 22, 2025.

This update outlines many of the most consequential healthcare provisions, with a focus on Medicaid financing, eligibility, and operational impacts. It also highlights how stakeholders can act now to prepare for what happens next.

From Proposal to Policy: What Changed

The Senate鈥檚 amended version of H.R. 1, approved on July 1 and passed by the House on July 3, 2025, reshaped several key provisions in the earlier version of the House bill. Although the bill retains its core focus on tax policy and entitlement reforms, it further constrains state Medicaid financing and eligibility and scales back Marketplace subsidies for certain populations.

According to preliminary  from the Congressional Budget Office, the final bill will reduce federal healthcare spending by approximately $1.15 trillion over the next decade but also will increase the number of uninsured individuals by 11.8 million by 2034 because of changes to both Medicaid and Marketplace programs.

Medicaid Eligibility: A New Era of Policy and Operational Complexity

Mandatory Community Engagement Requirements

By December 31, 2026, states must implement community engagement (work) requirements for certain Medicaid enrollees. These requirements cannot be waived under Section 1115, though states may request 鈥済ood faith鈥 exemptions through 2028.

States must notify enrollees through multiple channels and develop the infrastructure needed to track compliance. Managed care organizations and other entities that have financial relationships with Medicaid services are prohibited from determining compliance.

Tighter Eligibility and Redetermination Requirements

States must now conduct Medicaid eligibility redeterminations every six months for expansion populations. The bill also delays implementation of previously finalized rules that would have streamlined enrollment and imposes new verification requirements, including address checks. For immigrants, H.R. 1 narrows the definition of 鈥渜ualified鈥 individuals who are eligible for Medicaid and CHIP, removing coverage for refugees, asylees, and other humanitarian categories.

Cost Sharing for Expansion Adults

Starting in 2028, states must apply cost-sharing requirements to Medicaid expansion adults with incomes greater than 100 percent of the federal poverty level. Though primary care, mental health, and certain other services are exempt, the policy introduces new administrative burdens for states and many providers.

Medicaid Financing: A Structural Shift

Provider Tax Restrictions

H.R. 1 freezes existing provider tax programs and bars any new taxes. Also, Medicaid expansion states must phase down the maximum allowable tax rate from 6 percent to 3.5 percent by 2032. This change will significantly constrain states鈥 ability to use provider taxes to finance Medicaid and draw down federal matching funds.

Limits on State-Directed Payments

The bill caps state-directed payments at either 100 percent or 110 percent of Medicare rates, depending on the state鈥檚 expansion status. Grandfathered payment arrangements will be phased down by 10 percent annually beginning in 2028. These provisions will require states to reassess supplemental payment strategies and may affect provider participation and access to care.

Other Key Provisions

The Rural Health Transformation Program provides $50 billion over five years to support financially distressed rural providers. H.R. 1 requires that each state submit a plan, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administrator must approve or deny the plan by December 31, 2025, giving CMS and the US Department of Health and Human Services significant authority to shape the approval/denial processes, as well as critical details of the program and funding decisions.

For the Marketplace, the law eliminates ACA subsidy eligibility for certain lawfully present immigrants, ends conditional eligibility for ACA subsidies as well as passive re-enrollment, and eliminates the cap on ACA subsidy repayment at tax time. It also prohibits individuals who are not enrolled in Medicaid because of a failure to satisfy community engagement requirements from receiving any subsidies.

In addition, a new 1915(c) waiver option allows states to offer home and community-based services (HCBS) without requiring that they provide institutional level of care but only if waiting lists for existing services are not extended. Another provision excludes family planning and abortion service providers from receiving Medicaid funding if they received at least $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in 2023.

Finally, the law includes a one-year, 2.5 percent increase to the Medicare physician fee schedule conversion factor, which will be in effect for calendar year 2026 and expire thereafter.

What Stakeholders Should Do Now

States can begin planning for eligibility system changes, redetermination volume, and community engagement implementation, all of which require an understanding of the potential interactions of the federal Medicaid, Medicare, and ACA Marketplace policy changes. In addition, state officials should consider reassessing provider tax structures and supplemental payment strategies, where applicable. They need to engage early on rural health transformation funding opportunities and other provider supports.

Health plans can forecast enrollment and risk mix changes. They have opportunities to support states in compliance efforts to avoid federal funding recoupments. In addition, plans must prepare for new administrative requirements related to cost sharing and work requirements, among other policy changes on the horizon. Consumer communications should also be a focus area.

Providers and community-based organizations will need to prepare for greater uncompensated care needs and costs, which can lead to potential revenue loss, as well as new reporting and program integrity expectations. They also will play an integral role in assisting patients in maintaining coverage and navigating new requirements.

Vendors and health information exchanges have several opportunities to support the implementation of new requirements in H.R. 1 alongside the changing regulatory priorities. Examples include reviewing system capabilities to support new eligibility, verification, and reporting requirements and coordinating with states to ensure smooth implementation and program integrity.

Looking Ahead

The passage of H.R. 1 marks a turning point in federal health policy. Although the law鈥檚 fiscal goals are clear, its operational impacts will unfold over the coming months and years. States, plans, providers, and community organizations must now pivot from policy analysis to implementation readiness.

红领巾瓜报 will continue to monitor federal guidance, state responses, and stakeholder strategies. For more detailed analysis or support with scenario planning, contact聽our experts below.

Blog

What the Senate’s Budget Approval Means for the Future

Read Blog

On July 1, 2025, the US Senate voted 51鈥50, to advance its version of , continuing the budget reconciliation process. Like the bill that the House passed in May, the Senate language calls for making significant changes to the Medicare, Medicaid, Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace programs, as well as health savings accounts (HSAs) and publicly funded programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Relative to the House bill, however, the Senate differs substantially in approach and scope. Thus, the bill has been sent back to the House for consideration. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) intends to accelerate voting with the goal of clearing the legislation in the House by July 4, 2025.

Key Differences Between House and Senate Bills

Notable differences between the House and Senate packages pertain to the following:

  • Medicaid Provider Payments: The Senate version includes more restrictive changes to federal Medicaid provider taxes and state-directed payment policies. These changes are expected to affect hospitals that rely on Medicaid supplemental payments. The Senate bill also would create a $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program to mitigate financial strain on healthcare providers in rural communities. The provision includes several stipulations regarding distributions, allocations, eligibility standards, and permissible uses of the funds, which will likely prompt considerable ongoing engagement from stakeholders if signed into law, particularly among hospitals and clinics that will face substantial headwinds under other components of the legislation.
  • ACA Marketplaces: Like the House bill, the Senate version includes provisions to recapture full ACA subsidy amounts, restrict subsidy eligibility for certain immigrant populations, and require verification of ACA subsidy eligibility. The Senate bill neither appropriates funding for cost sharing reduction subsidies nor includes provisions regarding the Marketplace Integrity and Affordability rule, which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized on June 20, 2025. In addition, the Senate bill offers several smaller flexibilities intended to increase usage of HSAs but does not include the full suite of HSA changes included in the House bill. The Senate language also does not call for expanding individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements (ICHRAs).
  • More Limited Medicare Package: Although the Senate language restores the ORPHAN Cures Act and adds a modest one-year payment increase under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS), the bill omits a number of significant Medicare policies included in the House version, including a much broader PFS investment tied to the Medicare Economic Index, as well as multiple pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reforms under Medicare Part D. The Senate legislation also excludes two Medicaid PBM provisions that the House had included.

Estimates from the Congressional Budget Office

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has provided several  of the cost and coverage impacts of the healthcare and tax provisions in multiple versions of the reconciliation legislation. CBO has provided cost estimates for the , as well as the Senate  but has yet to release information on the final Senate version. Of note, CBO estimated the following:

  • The Medicaid, Medicare, and ACA related provisions in the Senate substitute amendment would reduce healthcare spending by approximately $1.15 trillion over the next 10 years.
  • The House bill would, by 2034, add 10.9 million people to the number of uninsured individuals in the United States.

What to Watch

Stakeholders should plan for the financial, policy, and operational impacts of the many provisions that could be enacted, including:

  • New administrative requirements for enrollment that will place additional obligations on individuals seeking coverage and which will require more state resources to implement and manage. Community engagement and work requirements are scheduled to take effect December 31, 2026.
  • Downward Medicaid financial pressures due to fewer federal funds, which will stress state budgets and states鈥 ability to maintain existing programs. This situation could lead some states to scale back eligibility for Medicaid, limitenrollment for optional programs, or some combination of these. Additionally, states could be expected to address increases in uncompensated care among their providers.
  • A pause on implementation of previously finalized regulations that streamlined the Medicaid enrollment process for individuals.

The combination of the House and Senate reconciliation bills and the recently finalized Marketplace Program Integrity and Affordability rule indicate an uncertain future for cost sharing subsides and enhanced premium tax credits in Marketplace programs. Healthcare stakeholders should prepare for the impact of the expiration of the enhanced premium tax credits would have on benefit packages, enrollee risk profiles, uncompensated care, and other key issues affecting access, cost, and outcomes.

Connect with Us

To learn more about the these policy changes and the impact on your organization,聽contact our featured experts below.

Webinar

Webinar Replay – The Future of the ACA Individual Market: Policy Shifts and the Proposals Before Congress

Watch Now

This webinar was held on July 10, 2025.

Watch for an in-depth discussion on the future of the individual market and the impacts of potential Congressional and regulatory changes to the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This webinar explored findings from a new Wakely report which estimates that ACA enrollment could decrease by 11 to 13 million as a result of these pending changes, representing a 47% to 57% decline. The report also projects that market average premiums could increase between 7% and 11.5% on top of claims trend. The report鈥檚 analysis considers a range of influential factors, including provisions in the House budget reconciliation bill, the Marketplace Integrity and Affordability regulation, and the scheduled expiration of enhanced premium tax credits in 2026. 红领巾瓜报, Wakely, and Leavitt Partners experts unpacked the current federal and state policy landscape and their potential effects on coverage access, affordability, and the long-term viability of the individual market.

Learning Objectives:

  • Interpret the projected coverage and premium impacts
  • Understand the role of expiring premium tax credits
  • Assess potential responses and strategies

Download the webinar transcript here.

Download the webinar Q&A here.

Blog

Medicaid Redetermination Ripple Effects in the Individual Market

Read Blog

As Congress intensifies negotiations over budget reconciliation, including potential changes to Medicaid financing and Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies, new data from Wakely Consulting Group, an 红领巾瓜报 (红领巾瓜报) company, sheds light on how the effects of the Medicaid redetermination process continued to unfold well into 2024. Appendix A of the May 2025 white paper , provides a full-year view of enrollment and morbidity trends, showing that the influx of former Medicaid enrollees had some negative effects on risk scores. In fact, relative risk increased across all market types鈥攕tate-based exchanges (SBEs), in federally facilitated exchange (FFE) Medicaid expansion states, and FFEs in non-expansion states鈥攄espite substantial enrollment growth.

Data presented in Wakely鈥檚  and their experts鈥 findings challenge the conventional assumption that higher enrollment dilutes risk and suggest that many new enrollees may have had unmet health needs or delayed care. The data also show that states with the highest enrollment growth did not necessarily experience the greatest morbidity shifts. This decoupling of enrollment and morbidity complicates forecasting for insurers and policymakers alike, especially as Congress debates Medicaid funding and ACA subsidy structures in the ongoing budget reconciliation process.

What to Watch

As federal lawmakers consider reforms that could alter Medicaid eligibility, subsidies, and risk adjustment mechanics, these findings underscore the importance of monitoring not just how many people enroll, but who they are and the type of care they need. The individual market鈥檚 evolving risk profile will have direct implications for premium setting, subsidy design, and the financial stability of plans that serve this population.

Connect with Us

Wakely is experienced in all facets of the healthcare industry鈥攆rom carriers to providers to government agencies. Wakely鈥檚 actuarial experts and policy analysts continually monitor and analyze potential changes to inform clients鈥 strategies and propel their success.

For more questions about the analysis contact our experts below.

Ready to talk?